sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Pieter Lenaerts <pieter.lenaerts AT telenet.be>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] New stable grimoire released
- Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 08:10:50 +0200
On Thu, 26 May 2005 13:22:02 -0700
Seth Alan Woolley <seth AT positivism.org> wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 03:46:13PM -0400, Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:
> > Quoting Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>:
> >
> > >[0] http://wiki.sourcemage.org/index.php?page=Stable0.0Notes
> >
> > From this page:
> > > prometheus will either be resurrected or rewritten -- debate
ensues
> >
> > Where is the debate taking place, forums, irc? It's certainly not
on the
> > list.
>
> On IRC between the various direct stakeholders.
I've no wish to kick any of you, but is this debate about prometheus limited
to "It will have to happen but not now" ? As you know if you've been on irc,
I've been asking about prometheus and close to noone knew what was happening,
including the direct stakeholders iirc. I repeat, this is not an attack to
these stakeholders, only a pointing out that I don't think any directed
action exists on this matter.
The reason for me bringing this up: I tried putting up an old box to run
stable and stable-rc tests on it. It broke completely by merely casting
spells. Hence my concern...
I'm convinced we need more participation of developers for thorough testing
on the stable stuff. problem here is that no developer ever runs stable
except some.
seth and thomas, aren't you low on manpower?
>
> --
> Seth Alan Woolley [seth at positivism.org], SPAM/UCE is unauthorized
> Key id 00BA3AF3 = 8BE0 A72E A47E A92A 0737 F2FF 7A3F 6D3C 00BA 3AF3
> Quality Assurance Team Leader; Security Team Member, Leader Emeritus
> Linux so advanced, it may as well be magic http://www.sourcemage.org
> Elected Coordinating Committee Member, Secretary, and Finances Chair
> Pacific Green Party of Oregon - Peace - http://www.pacificgreens.org
>
--
Pieter Lenaerts
Koning Boudewijnlaan 12
B-9840 DE PINTE
0485/189.222
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New stable grimoire released
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New stable grimoire released,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 05/26/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New stable grimoire released,
Seth Alan Woolley, 05/26/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New stable grimoire released,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 05/26/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New stable grimoire released,
Seth Alan Woolley, 05/26/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New stable grimoire released,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 05/26/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New stable grimoire released,
Seth Alan Woolley, 05/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New stable grimoire released, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 05/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New stable grimoire released, Eric Sandall, 05/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New stable grimoire released, Seth Alan Woolley, 05/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New stable grimoire released, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 05/27/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New stable grimoire released,
Seth Alan Woolley, 05/27/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New stable grimoire released,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 05/26/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New stable grimoire released,
Seth Alan Woolley, 05/26/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New stable grimoire released,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 05/26/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New stable grimoire released,
Seth Alan Woolley, 05/26/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New stable grimoire released,
Pieter Lenaerts, 05/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New stable grimoire released, Seth Alan Woolley, 05/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New stable grimoire released, Pieter Lenaerts, 05/27/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New stable grimoire released,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 05/26/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.