sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] stuff to test for x86_64 iso image?
- From: "Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergey AT sourcemage.org>
- To: Benoit PAPILLAULT <benoit.papillault AT sourcemage.org>
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] stuff to test for x86_64 iso image?
- Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 23:08:46 -0500
Benoit PAPILLAULT wrote:
When I try to "cast linux" to get it to recognize via rhine as eth0, everything goes ok until the actual compilation starts, right after I select all the kernel options. Here, I get the following message repeated endlessly:
find: error while loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/installwatch.so: cannot open shared object file: no such file or directory
The ISO install sorcery-stable and you need the proj2 branch of sorcery to properly compile on x86_64. Grab it in p4.
I compared devel and proj/proj2, they are not that different. I don't see any mention of SUBARCH and SUBLIB anywhere in the code. Also, LIB's variable name is too general, and the value can be made '/lib' by default, so module build_api/api2 can be just merged, together with new architectures. The others I'm not sure about, but the changes don't look too dramatic. Are more changes planned in proj2?
Anyway, I copied proj2 over and did ./install. The same error (see above) happens anyway. It actually happens for mkdir, find, and sleep as far as I can see. What do I do?
Thanks!
Sergey.
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stuff to test for x86_64 iso image?
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stuff to test for x86_64 iso image?,
Jose Bernardo Silva, 02/07/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] stuff to test for x86_64 iso image?, Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 02/07/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stuff to test for x86_64 iso image?,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/07/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stuff to test for x86_64 iso image?,
Eric Sandall, 02/07/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stuff to test for x86_64 iso image?,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 02/07/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] stuff to test for x86_64 iso image?, Seth Alan Woolley, 02/07/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] stuff to test for x86_64 iso image?, Eric Sandall, 02/07/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stuff to test for x86_64 iso image?,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 02/07/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stuff to test for x86_64 iso image?,
Eric Sandall, 02/07/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stuff to test for x86_64 iso image?,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 02/12/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] stuff to test for x86_64 iso image?, Karsten Behrmann, 02/12/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stuff to test for x86_64 iso image?,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/12/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stuff to test for x86_64 iso image?,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 02/12/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] stuff to test for x86_64 iso image?, Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stuff to test for x86_64 iso image?,
Adam Clark, 02/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stuff to test for x86_64 iso image?,
Andrew, 02/13/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] stuff to test for x86_64 iso image?, Adam Clark, 02/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stuff to test for x86_64 iso image?,
Andrew, 02/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stuff to test for x86_64 iso image?,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 02/12/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stuff to test for x86_64 iso image?,
Jose Bernardo Silva, 02/07/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.