sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality
- From: Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality
- Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 13:27:24 -0800
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 03:58:08PM -0500, Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:
> Thanks Seth, I didn't mean to pick on anybody!
> Was it ever expressed in the forums that the use of "sorcery" vs "gaze"
> becomes more and more confusing, even to those who used it for a long
> time, like me? I wonder if I'm alone here.
>
I dont know if it was ever expressed explicitly somewhere, the rule of
thumb Ive tried to follow is that if it looks at something (but doesnt
modify the system itself) gaze does it (or at least can do it), whereas
if it does something to the system (like exiling or un-exiling a spell)
one of the other commands does it, namely sorcery.
Theres lots of historical artifacts and exceptions to this and everyone
probably draws the line either a different place, or in different
direction...
Sometimes I wish we hadn't joined the web and tome teams and we had
a tome team like we did before of (mostly) non-coding developers writing
the user side docs and helping document and resolve things like this,
getting a consistent and predictable user interface...
-Andrew
--
__________________________________________________________________________
|Andrew D. Stitt | astitt at sourcemage.org |
|irc: afrayedknot | afrayedknot at t.armory.com |
|aim: thefrayedknot or iteratorplusplus | acedit at armory.com |
|Sorcery Team Lead | ftp://t.armory.com/ |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
pgpNGbMZbsNTj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/25/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality,
Andrew, 01/25/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality,
neuron, 01/25/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality,
Seth Alan Woolley, 01/25/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/25/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality,
Andrew, 01/25/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality, Duane Malcolm, 01/25/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality, Andrew, 01/25/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality,
Andrew, 01/25/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality,
Seth Alan Woolley, 01/25/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/25/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality, Andrew, 01/25/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality, Seth Alan Woolley, 01/25/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/25/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality, Arwed von Merkatz, 01/25/2005
- Sorcery Consistency (WAS: Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality), Paul Mahon, 01/25/2005
- Re: Sorcery Consistency (WAS: Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality), Seth Alan Woolley, 01/25/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/25/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality, David Kowis, 01/25/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality,
Seth Alan Woolley, 01/25/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality,
neuron, 01/25/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality,
Andrew, 01/25/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/25/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.