sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality
- From: Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality
- Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 12:45:34 -0800
Wrong word sorry, i had just woken up when i wrote that. Anyways, someday
we might have more spell states than held and exiled and i dont want to
end up polluting the gaze command namespace, if it has the show prefix
its less messy. Although i'd rather have it be
gaze show held
gaze show exiled
oh well.
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 03:29:17PM -0500, Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:
> And I thought we're trying to be "parallel," 'cause "orthogonal" usually
> means "contrary to" or "regardless of" ;-D. FWIW, my variant is shorter...
>
> Seth Alan Woolley wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 09:18:26PM +0100, neuron wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 09:48:08AM -0800, Andrew wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 11:21:40AM -0500, Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Why not simply "gaze exiled" or even "gaze exile" (it's both a
> >>>>verb and a noun)?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>I think we were trying to be orthoganol to gaze show-held
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Exactly :)
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Well, not quite "exactly". I thought it was spelled "orthogonal".
> >
> >Seth
> >
> >
> >
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >SM-Discuss mailing list
> >SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> >http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
> >
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------
> The information contained in this message is intended only for the
> recipient, and may be a confidential attorney-client communication or may
> otherwise be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If
> the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or
> agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient,
> please be aware that any dissemination or copying of this communication is
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
> please immediately notify us by replying to the message and deleting it
> from your computer.
>
> --------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
--
__________________________________________________________________________
|Andrew D. Stitt | astitt at sourcemage.org |
|irc: afrayedknot | afrayedknot at t.armory.com |
|aim: thefrayedknot or iteratorplusplus | acedit at armory.com |
|Sorcery Team Lead | ftp://t.armory.com/ |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
pgpuCv89j60mM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality,
neuron, 01/25/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/25/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality,
Andrew, 01/25/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality,
neuron, 01/25/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality,
Seth Alan Woolley, 01/25/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/25/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality,
Andrew, 01/25/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality, Duane Malcolm, 01/25/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality, Andrew, 01/25/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality,
Andrew, 01/25/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality,
Seth Alan Woolley, 01/25/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/25/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality, Andrew, 01/25/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality, Seth Alan Woolley, 01/25/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/25/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality, Arwed von Merkatz, 01/25/2005
- Sorcery Consistency (WAS: Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality), Paul Mahon, 01/25/2005
- Re: Sorcery Consistency (WAS: Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality), Seth Alan Woolley, 01/25/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/25/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality,
Seth Alan Woolley, 01/25/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality,
neuron, 01/25/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality,
Andrew, 01/25/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] devel sorcery & gaze new functionality,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/25/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.