sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] i386 ISO
- Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:41:27 -0800
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 07:34:54PM +0100, Karsten Behrmann wrote:
> > If they don't want NPTL than they can install the 2.4 ISO. If they then
> > still
> > want 2.6 they can recast linux. I'd say that our 2.6 ISO should be
> > "modern" and
> > use udev and NPTL by default while the 2.4 can be for backwards
> > compatibility.
> Okay, but this also means that the "modern" ISO needs to be >i386, as
> seemingly
> NPTL doesn't work on i386.
> But now the question arises, if the thing is "modern" anyway, shouldn't we
> be
> able to assume i586/i686 even?
How about we make isos as follows
2.4 i386 non-NPTL
2.6 i386 non-NPTL
2.4 i686 non-NPTL
2.6 i686 NPTL
Then everyone is happy, if you want 2.6 without nptl out of the box,
you use the i386 version, if you nptl and 2.6 out of the box use the
i686 version.
(replace 686 with 586 if you can have nptl on a 586)
-Andrew
--
__________________________________________________________________________
|Andrew D. Stitt | astitt at sourcemage.org |
|irc: afrayedknot | afrayedknot at t.armory.com |
|aim: thefrayedknot or iteratorplusplus | acedit at armory.com |
|Sorcery Team Lead | ftp://t.armory.com/ |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
pgpTZoc9LZxUH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] i386 ISO,
Karsten Behrmann, 01/05/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] i386 ISO,
Eric Sandall, 01/05/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] i386 ISO,
Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 01/05/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] i386 ISO,
Arwed von Merkatz, 01/06/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] i386 ISO,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 01/06/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] i386 ISO,
Arwed von Merkatz, 01/06/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] i386 ISO,
Eric Sandall, 01/06/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] i386 ISO, Karsten Behrmann, 01/06/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] i386 ISO, Andrew, 01/06/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] i386 ISO, Karsten Behrmann, 01/06/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] i386 ISO, Mathieu L., 01/06/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] i386 ISO, Eric Sandall, 01/06/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] i386 ISO,
Eric Sandall, 01/06/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] i386 ISO, Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 01/06/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] i386 ISO, Benoit PAPILLAULT, 01/07/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] i386 ISO, Seth Alan Woolley, 01/07/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] i386 ISO, Benoit PAPILLAULT, 01/07/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] i386 ISO, Andrew, 01/07/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] i386 ISO, Benoit PAPILLAULT, 01/08/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] i386 ISO, Andrew, 01/08/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] i386 ISO,
Arwed von Merkatz, 01/06/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] i386 ISO,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 01/06/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] i386 ISO,
Arwed von Merkatz, 01/06/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] i386 ISO,
Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 01/05/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] i386 ISO,
Eric Sandall, 01/05/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.