sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Re: [SM-Discuss] perforce vs. others

From: Maurizio Boriani <debauxit AT yahoo.it>
To: Eric Schabell <eschabell AT sourcemage.org>
Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] perforce vs. others
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 00:53:45 +0200

>>>>> "Eric" == Eric Schabell <eschabell AT sourcemage.org> writes:

Eric> On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 05:23:26PM +0200, Maurizio Boriani
Eric> wrote:
>> Hi all, why use perforce (a proprietary software) for code
>> versioning instead of arch or cvs? Which advantages are there
>> in using it (I never used it before)?

ok... no more... you are the gurus... mine was only an opinion

regards

--
Maurizio Boriani
GPG key: 0xCC0FBF8F
fingerprint => E429 A37C 5259 763C 9DEE FC8B 5D61 C796 CC0F BF8F <=
fingerprint

[SM-Discuss] perforce vs. others, Maurizio Boriani, 06/14/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] perforce vs. others, Arwed von Merkatz, 06/14/2004
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] perforce vs. others, Maurizio Boriani, 06/14/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] perforce vs. others, Vladimír Marek, 06/14/2004
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] perforce vs. others, Maurizio Boriani, 06/14/2004
    - Re: [SM-Discuss] perforce vs. others, Paul, 06/14/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] perforce vs. others, Eric Schabell, 06/14/2004
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] perforce vs. others, Maurizio Boriani, 06/14/2004
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] perforce vs. others, Tony Smith, 06/16/2004
    - Re: [SM-Discuss] perforce vs. others, Arwed von Merkatz, 06/17/2004
      - Re: [SM-Discuss] perforce vs. others, Tony Smith, 06/17/2004