Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] perforce vs. others

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] perforce vs. others
  • Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 18:41:24 +0200

On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 05:23:26PM +0200, Maurizio Boriani wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> why use perforce (a proprietary software) for code versioning instead of
> arch or cvs? Which advantages are there in using it (I never used it
> before)?

We are planning to add subversion to the mix, just takes some time to
get the server and all stuff imported. cvs is definitely not an option
for the grimoire, as grimoire work involves quite some moving around,
which cvs can't handle. arch is quite powerful, but as long as its usage
stays as arcane and clumsy as it is now I wouldn't consider using it.

> For what readed on www.perforce.com it doesn't seems to haa something
> special
> better than others... instead, for less, it isn't free. Why not switch to
> something else?
>
> best regards,
>
> --
> Maurizio Boriani
> GPG key: 0xCC0FBF8F
> fingerprint => E429 A37C 5259 763C 9DEE FC8B 5D61 C796 CC0F BF8F <=
> fingerprint
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>

--
Arwed v. Merkatz Source Mage GNU/Linux developer
http://www.sourcemage.org




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page