Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Jason Flatt <jason AT flattfamily.com>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells
  • Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 21:08:29 -0700

On Thursday 13 May 2004 10:40 am, Arwed von Merkatz wrote:
>
> I'd really prefer a flag in DETAILS saying on which architectures the spell
> works.
> Making arch specific grimoires makes the whole thing a lot more
> complicated, especially thinking about the future with more than the
> current x86 and ppc archs. E.g. if a spell work on x86 and ppc, but not
> on sparc and arm, we'd need to maintain two seperate version of the
> spell (one for ppc, one for x86), with a flag we'd just mark the spell
> working on x86 and ppc and maintain it in one place.

And, of course, adding any possibly special or different files that need to
be
processed depending on the architecture.

--
Jason Flatt (jason @ flattfamily . com)
Father of five (http://www.flattfamily.com/)
Linux user (http://www.sourcemage.org/)
IRC Nick: Oadae Channels: #sourcemage, #lvlug Server: irc.freenode.net

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS/IT d(-) s+:- a>++++ C++$(+++) UL++++ P(+) L+++ E- W++ N+@ o? K? w-- O?
M-- V PS- PE+ Y+ PGP@ t 5+ X R tv--() b+@ DI+@ D+++ G e h---- r+++ y++++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page