sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Jason Flatt <jason AT flattfamily.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells
- Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 21:08:29 -0700
On Thursday 13 May 2004 10:40 am, Arwed von Merkatz wrote:
>
> I'd really prefer a flag in DETAILS saying on which architectures the spell
> works.
> Making arch specific grimoires makes the whole thing a lot more
> complicated, especially thinking about the future with more than the
> current x86 and ppc archs. E.g. if a spell work on x86 and ppc, but not
> on sparc and arm, we'd need to maintain two seperate version of the
> spell (one for ppc, one for x86), with a flag we'd just mark the spell
> working on x86 and ppc and maintain it in one place.
And, of course, adding any possibly special or different files that need to
be
processed depending on the architecture.
--
Jason Flatt (jason @ flattfamily . com)
Father of five (http://www.flattfamily.com/)
Linux user (http://www.sourcemage.org/)
IRC Nick: Oadae Channels: #sourcemage, #lvlug Server: irc.freenode.net
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS/IT d(-) s+:- a>++++ C++$(+++) UL++++ P(+) L+++ E- W++ N+@ o? K? w-- O?
M-- V PS- PE+ Y+ PGP@ t 5+ X R tv--() b+@ DI+@ D+++ G e h---- r+++ y++++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
-
[SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells,
Eric Sandall, 05/12/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells, Robin Cook, 05/12/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells, ruskie, 05/12/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells,
Jason Flatt, 05/12/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells,
Eric Sandall, 05/12/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells,
Arwed von Merkatz, 05/13/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells,
Jason Flatt, 05/14/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells,
Arwed von Merkatz, 05/14/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells,
Eric Sandall, 05/14/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells, Seth Alan Woolley, 05/14/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells, Eric Sandall, 05/14/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells, Andrew, 05/14/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells, Arwed von Merkatz, 05/14/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells, Eric Sandall, 05/14/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells,
Eric Sandall, 05/14/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells,
Arwed von Merkatz, 05/14/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells,
Jason Flatt, 05/14/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells,
Arwed von Merkatz, 05/13/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells,
Eric Sandall, 05/12/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells, Arjan Bouter, 05/14/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells, Paul Mahon, 05/13/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.