sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells
- Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 09:21:15 -0700
Quoting Seth Alan Woolley <seth AT positivism.org>:
> > So, perhaps an ARCHS flag?
> >
> > ARCHS="x86 ppc ppc64 sparc sparc64 etc."
> >
> > With the architectures specified being ones that this spell works on? Then
> we
> > can put architecture-specific checks in BUILD (or other files, much like
> the
> > linux spell does) to do any architecture-specific options.
> >
> > -sandalle
>
> with ARCHS when unset in DETAILs be set to all ARCHS that we support.
Good idea. Or perhaps we should reverse the ARCHS flag and have it specify the
architectures this spell does /not/ work on, as that would probably be the
smaller list.
-sandalle
--
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61 | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
-
[SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells,
Eric Sandall, 05/12/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells, Robin Cook, 05/12/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells, ruskie, 05/12/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells,
Jason Flatt, 05/12/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells,
Eric Sandall, 05/12/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells,
Arwed von Merkatz, 05/13/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells,
Jason Flatt, 05/14/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells,
Arwed von Merkatz, 05/14/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells,
Eric Sandall, 05/14/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells, Seth Alan Woolley, 05/14/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells, Eric Sandall, 05/14/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells, Andrew, 05/14/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells, Arwed von Merkatz, 05/14/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells, Eric Sandall, 05/14/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells,
Eric Sandall, 05/14/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells,
Arwed von Merkatz, 05/14/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells,
Jason Flatt, 05/14/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells,
Arwed von Merkatz, 05/13/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells,
Eric Sandall, 05/12/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells, Arjan Bouter, 05/14/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells,
Paul Mahon, 05/13/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells, Andrew, 05/13/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells,
Jose Bernardo Silva, 05/13/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells, Andrew, 05/13/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.