sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells
- Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 08:19:21 +0200
On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 09:08:29PM -0700, Jason Flatt wrote:
> On Thursday 13 May 2004 10:40 am, Arwed von Merkatz wrote:
> >
> > I'd really prefer a flag in DETAILS saying on which architectures the
> > spell
> > works.
> > Making arch specific grimoires makes the whole thing a lot more
> > complicated, especially thinking about the future with more than the
> > current x86 and ppc archs. E.g. if a spell work on x86 and ppc, but not
> > on sparc and arm, we'd need to maintain two seperate version of the
> > spell (one for ppc, one for x86), with a flag we'd just mark the spell
> > working on x86 and ppc and maintain it in one place.
>
> And, of course, adding any possibly special or different files that need to
> be
> processed depending on the architecture.
Yes, although for most autotool based software it will be the same, and
for many others it could be handled with a switch in the BUILD file.
--
Arwed v. Merkatz Source Mage GNU/Linux developer
http://www.sourcemage.org
-
[SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells,
Eric Sandall, 05/12/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells, Robin Cook, 05/12/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells, ruskie, 05/12/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells,
Jason Flatt, 05/12/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells,
Eric Sandall, 05/12/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells,
Arwed von Merkatz, 05/13/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells,
Jason Flatt, 05/14/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells,
Arwed von Merkatz, 05/14/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells,
Eric Sandall, 05/14/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells, Seth Alan Woolley, 05/14/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells, Eric Sandall, 05/14/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells, Andrew, 05/14/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells, Arwed von Merkatz, 05/14/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells, Eric Sandall, 05/14/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells,
Eric Sandall, 05/14/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells,
Arwed von Merkatz, 05/14/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells,
Jason Flatt, 05/14/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells,
Arwed von Merkatz, 05/13/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells,
Eric Sandall, 05/12/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells, Arjan Bouter, 05/14/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells,
Paul Mahon, 05/13/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Architecture-dependent spells, Andrew, 05/13/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.