sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?
- From: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Cc: Bas van Gils <bas.vangils AT cs.kun.nl>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?
- Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 11:24:01 +0100
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 11:15:56AM +0100, Bas van Gils wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 10:48:52AM +0100, Arwed von Merkatz wrote:
> > I agree, having all those lists is just silly when you look at our
> > number of developers.
>
>
> Perhaps I don't have a say in this, given the fact that I'm not a developer
> but.... I stronly disagree. I'm very much in favor of having separate lists,
> especially for the users.
I didn't say we should get rid of the users list, just that all
development lists should be folded into one list.
Imho having sm-discuss for development discussions and sm-users for all
other discussions would be a nice solution.
> Anyway, thats just my five cents.
>
> Bas
>
> --
> drs. Bas van Gils <Bas.vanGils AT cs.kun.nl> | /(bb|[^b]{2})/
> http://www.cs.kun.nl/~basvg | that's the
> question
> PGP = 3805 664A F24E 90D5 6A77 C624 E13D 0440 2768 A493 |
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
--
Arwed v. Merkatz Sourcemage GNU/Linux developer
http://www.sourcemage.org
-
[SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?,
Hamish Greig, 03/14/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?, Dufflebunk, 03/14/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 03/14/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?,
Hamish Greig, 03/14/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?,
Andrew, 03/14/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?,
Arwed von Merkatz, 03/15/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?,
Bas van Gils, 03/15/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?, Arwed von Merkatz, 03/15/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?, Eric Sandall, 03/15/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?, Eric Sandall, 03/15/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?,
Bas van Gils, 03/15/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?, Eric Sandall, 03/15/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?,
Arwed von Merkatz, 03/15/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?,
Eric Schabell, 03/15/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?,
Eric Sandall, 03/15/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?, Eric Schabell, 03/16/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?,
Eric Sandall, 03/15/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?,
Andrew, 03/14/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?,
Eric Schabell, 03/15/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?, Eric Sandall, 03/15/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?,
Hamish Greig, 03/14/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?,
Eric Schabell, 03/15/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?, Andrew, 03/15/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.