Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Bearcat M. Sandor" <Sorcerer AT TheDragonsEdge.com>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?
  • Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 19:16:58 -0700

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I, for one, second Afraidknots nomination. I have always found him helpful
and
knowledgeable.

For the record, I did not get the e-mail this this one is quoting. I wonder
if
others missed it as well.

Bearcat M. Sandor

On Sunday 14 March 2004 18:23 in an email titled "[SM-Discuss] Re:
[SM-Sorcery] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?" Hamish Greig wrote:
>On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 18:25, Eric Schabell wrote:
>> Howdy all,
>>
>> We have a possible new Sorcery Leader in the form of a well known and
>> experienced Smgl'er:
>>
>> Andrew Stitt (a.k.a. afraydknot)
>>
>> If there are others, I would like to start a discussion with responses
>> from the Sorcery Developers (see org chart) only as to the possible
>> other candidates, votes for / against this one, or thoughts on the
>> subject.
>>
>> I would like to get this done as soon as possible, so let youself be
>> heard. I will count the incomming votes and let you all know asap the
>> final outcome. Please post all replys here if you would.
>
>Having waited a week for any response, but seen none, I have to say what a
>load of horsecrap this is.
>This is not an internal issue for the sorcery team to discuss, it is for the
>project to discuss. All the grimoire gurus, all the sorcery team, all the
>iso/cauldron team, even all the users if they wish to be involved. It is not
>just about who wants to lead a team of developers, it is about their skill
>set, the standard of their work, their communication skills, their
>availability and their approachability. Anything less than full open
>discussion of applications to help steer this project is a farce.
>
>As a previously active guru I support Andrew's application to head sorcery.
>His previous work on sorcery and prometheus, his activity and discussions in
>bugzilla, his attendance on IRC and self-designated role as channel greeter,
>his support for me (and others) in many of my (our) mini-projects, his
>overall knowledge of the people and the project, these are all the reasons
>why I think he will make a good sorcery lead.
>
>Hamish
>_______________________________________________
>SM-Discuss mailing list
>SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
>http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAVRIfya+RPo9ly58RApVMAJkBBzihLxe0uDlEVoyt9k7rw4Xx0wCfd74L
RsrdKs/L3Lv9+kDZBKzXuhE=
=q1S/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page