sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs
- From: Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs
- Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 18:32:00 +1100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 18:59, David Kowis wrote:
> Nope :) I looked at what I'd have to do and instead just cast j2sdk-bin.
> Although that complained because unixODBC needs X11 to build its gui thing.
> So I just took that out of the depends and stuck j2sdk-bin on it. Works
> great. If the X11-libs is in the test I'll try that and see if it works.
> Thanks
> Dave
yep it's in test and stable.
Hamish
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/yZzw8fSufZR6424RAkHRAJ9sN/IxeFk1JmzojJFKUXdGE+5OeQCdEkgg
mp60yU397dlWxveNRad84Y0=
=EyCw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
[SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
David Kowis, 11/16/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
toxic, 11/17/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
David Kowis, 11/17/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
Hamish Greig, 11/17/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
David Kowis, 11/17/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
Casey Harkins, 11/17/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs, David Kowis, 11/17/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
Casey Harkins, 11/17/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
Hamish Greig, 11/28/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
David Kowis, 11/30/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs, Hamish Greig, 11/30/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
David Kowis, 11/30/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
David Kowis, 11/17/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
Hamish Greig, 11/17/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
David Kowis, 11/17/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
toxic, 11/17/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.