sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs
- From: David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org>
- To: Casey Harkins <charkins AT upl.cs.wisc.edu>
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs
- Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 21:45:49 -0600
D'oh!
I misinterprited the one thing I read about it... :)
I'll end up copying it to a personal grimoire and doing the array index thing
then.
Thanks
Dave
Quoting Casey Harkins <charkins AT upl.cs.wisc.edu>:
>
> scribble works, but this isn't exactly what it is for. scribble only
> creates a symlink in your private grimoire to a spell in another grimoire.
> Its intent is to allow you to specify which grimoire a particular spell is
> cast from. For this to work, the private grimoire needs to be before
> (meaning lower array index) the target grimoire in
> /etc/sorcery/local/grimoire.
>
>
> -casey
>
>
> On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, David Kowis wrote:
>
> > Does that "scribble" command work?
> > This would be an excellent opportunity to use it to make a copy of the
> spell and
> > ha><0r it. is it in devel or stable sorcery? I suppose I could put devel
> sorcery
> > on the test box, because it's a testing box...
> > thanks,
> > Dave
> > Quoting Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>:
> >
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 05:56, David Kowis wrote:
> > > > Not just the running of java though. I should've been more clear, but
> it's
> > > > the casting of j2sdk the spell that requires some X11Libs. I don't
> want
> > > any
> > > > libs. I know it used to work without the libs there. So a way to hack
> it
> > > > out of the spell or something would be nice. Probably can't happen
> that
> > > way
> > > > because the spell is now too nifty to do that.
> > >
> > > this is *slightly* possible
> > > some *stuff* does link to x11 libs during the compile but a minimal
> install
> > > using xfree86-libs should be possible, you will then get a failure when
> it
> > > can't link to libXi (-lXi) so edit out that files reference to -lXi and
> > > retry. I am not sure how many occurances there are I think only one.
> > > I don't remember if that is with lesstif or the bundled motif either.
> > > try it and see
> > > Hamish
> > >
> > > - --
> > > IRC nick: drmoriarty
> > > SMGL co-conspirator
> > > # Do You SMGL!?
> > > # http://www.sourcemage.org/
> > > # Linux so advanced it may as well be magic!
> > > ANTI-SPAM WARNING: I delete any html message from my server without
> reading
> > > Please use text only
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > > Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
> > >
> > > iD8DBQE/uWor8fSufZR6424RAuEuAJ0XHOxw5+1UICLhI/6ug/mwTJKmxACfUFlO
> > > 9bHjw3eyveAFZjZupX4tK8Y=
> > > =jo0V
> > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > SM-Discuss mailing list
> > > SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
> > >
> >
> >
> > _ ._ _ , _ ._
> > (_ ' ( ` )_ .__)
> > ( ( ( ) `) ) _)
> > (__ (_ (_ . _) _) ,__)
> > `~~`\ ' . /`~~`
> > ,::: ; ; :::,
> > ':::::::::::::::'
> > _____________/_ __ \____________
> > David Kowis
> > Computer Programmer
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------
> > This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
> > _______________________________________________
> > SM-Discuss mailing list
> > SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>
_ ._ _ , _ ._
(_ ' ( ` )_ .__)
( ( ( ) `) ) _)
(__ (_ (_ . _) _) ,__)
`~~`\ ' . /`~~`
,::: ; ; :::,
':::::::::::::::'
_____________/_ __ \____________
David Kowis
Computer Programmer
-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
-
[SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
David Kowis, 11/16/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
toxic, 11/17/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
David Kowis, 11/17/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
Hamish Greig, 11/17/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
David Kowis, 11/17/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
Casey Harkins, 11/17/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs, David Kowis, 11/17/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
Casey Harkins, 11/17/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
Hamish Greig, 11/28/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
David Kowis, 11/30/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs, Hamish Greig, 11/30/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
David Kowis, 11/30/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
David Kowis, 11/17/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
Hamish Greig, 11/17/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
David Kowis, 11/17/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
toxic, 11/17/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.