sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs
- From: Casey Harkins <charkins AT upl.cs.wisc.edu>
- To: David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org>
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs
- Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 21:00:20 -0600 (CST)
scribble works, but this isn't exactly what it is for. scribble only
creates a symlink in your private grimoire to a spell in another grimoire.
Its intent is to allow you to specify which grimoire a particular spell is
cast from. For this to work, the private grimoire needs to be before
(meaning lower array index) the target grimoire in
/etc/sorcery/local/grimoire.
-casey
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, David Kowis wrote:
> Does that "scribble" command work?
> This would be an excellent opportunity to use it to make a copy of the
> spell and
> ha><0r it. is it in devel or stable sorcery? I suppose I could put devel
> sorcery
> on the test box, because it's a testing box...
> thanks,
> Dave
> Quoting Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>:
>
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 05:56, David Kowis wrote:
> > > Not just the running of java though. I should've been more clear, but
> > > it's
> > > the casting of j2sdk the spell that requires some X11Libs. I don't want
> > any
> > > libs. I know it used to work without the libs there. So a way to hack it
> > > out of the spell or something would be nice. Probably can't happen that
> > way
> > > because the spell is now too nifty to do that.
> >
> > this is *slightly* possible
> > some *stuff* does link to x11 libs during the compile but a minimal
> > install
> > using xfree86-libs should be possible, you will then get a failure when it
> > can't link to libXi (-lXi) so edit out that files reference to -lXi and
> > retry. I am not sure how many occurances there are I think only one.
> > I don't remember if that is with lesstif or the bundled motif either.
> > try it and see
> > Hamish
> >
> > - --
> > IRC nick: drmoriarty
> > SMGL co-conspirator
> > # Do You SMGL!?
> > # http://www.sourcemage.org/
> > # Linux so advanced it may as well be magic!
> > ANTI-SPAM WARNING: I delete any html message from my server without
> > reading
> > Please use text only
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
> >
> > iD8DBQE/uWor8fSufZR6424RAuEuAJ0XHOxw5+1UICLhI/6ug/mwTJKmxACfUFlO
> > 9bHjw3eyveAFZjZupX4tK8Y=
> > =jo0V
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SM-Discuss mailing list
> > SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
> >
>
>
> _ ._ _ , _ ._
> (_ ' ( ` )_ .__)
> ( ( ( ) `) ) _)
> (__ (_ (_ . _) _) ,__)
> `~~`\ ' . /`~~`
> ,::: ; ; :::,
> ':::::::::::::::'
> _____________/_ __ \____________
> David Kowis
> Computer Programmer
>
> -------------------------------------------------
> This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>
-
[SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
David Kowis, 11/16/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
toxic, 11/17/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
David Kowis, 11/17/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
Hamish Greig, 11/17/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
David Kowis, 11/17/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
Casey Harkins, 11/17/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs, David Kowis, 11/17/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
Casey Harkins, 11/17/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
Hamish Greig, 11/28/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
David Kowis, 11/30/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs, Hamish Greig, 11/30/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
David Kowis, 11/30/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
David Kowis, 11/17/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
Hamish Greig, 11/17/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
David Kowis, 11/17/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
toxic, 11/17/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.