sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs
- From: David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org>
- To: Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs
- Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 20:20:54 -0600
Does that "scribble" command work?
This would be an excellent opportunity to use it to make a copy of the spell
and
ha><0r it. is it in devel or stable sorcery? I suppose I could put devel
sorcery
on the test box, because it's a testing box...
thanks,
Dave
Quoting Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 05:56, David Kowis wrote:
> > Not just the running of java though. I should've been more clear, but it's
> > the casting of j2sdk the spell that requires some X11Libs. I don't want
> any
> > libs. I know it used to work without the libs there. So a way to hack it
> > out of the spell or something would be nice. Probably can't happen that
> way
> > because the spell is now too nifty to do that.
>
> this is *slightly* possible
> some *stuff* does link to x11 libs during the compile but a minimal install
> using xfree86-libs should be possible, you will then get a failure when it
> can't link to libXi (-lXi) so edit out that files reference to -lXi and
> retry. I am not sure how many occurances there are I think only one.
> I don't remember if that is with lesstif or the bundled motif either.
> try it and see
> Hamish
>
> - --
> IRC nick: drmoriarty
> SMGL co-conspirator
> # Do You SMGL!?
> # http://www.sourcemage.org/
> # Linux so advanced it may as well be magic!
> ANTI-SPAM WARNING: I delete any html message from my server without reading
> Please use text only
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQE/uWor8fSufZR6424RAuEuAJ0XHOxw5+1UICLhI/6ug/mwTJKmxACfUFlO
> 9bHjw3eyveAFZjZupX4tK8Y=
> =jo0V
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>
_ ._ _ , _ ._
(_ ' ( ` )_ .__)
( ( ( ) `) ) _)
(__ (_ (_ . _) _) ,__)
`~~`\ ' . /`~~`
,::: ; ; :::,
':::::::::::::::'
_____________/_ __ \____________
David Kowis
Computer Programmer
-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
-
[SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
David Kowis, 11/16/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
toxic, 11/17/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
David Kowis, 11/17/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
Hamish Greig, 11/17/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
David Kowis, 11/17/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
Casey Harkins, 11/17/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs, David Kowis, 11/17/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
Casey Harkins, 11/17/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
Hamish Greig, 11/28/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
David Kowis, 11/30/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs, Hamish Greig, 11/30/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
David Kowis, 11/30/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
David Kowis, 11/17/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
Hamish Greig, 11/17/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
David Kowis, 11/17/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2dsk that doesn't require x11libs,
toxic, 11/17/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.