sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
[SM-Discuss] Re: Cross-Building - why not do a Cross-Build meta-spell ?
- From: Belxjander Serechai <Belxjander AT Icqmail.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [SM-Discuss] Re: Cross-Building - why not do a Cross-Build meta-spell ?
- Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2003 06:27:39 +1300
> Belxjander,
> Please post your spell - even not working yet, it sounds like a good
> starting point. What I'd change in it would be to get the spell to use
> the sorcery arch information (and maybe expand this info if not enough)
> as well as enabling the cross-compile options.
it is only a bare script at this point that has functional parts in it
> As for a specific cross-compile grimoire, we could also put in it spells
> that need heavy changes to be able to cross-compile, as well as spells
> that are of use only to cross-compiles (as you xgcc toolchain is). As
> for the other spells... Well, I don't think w0rf would mind adding the
> patches for the different architectures to his kernel patches
> collection, and I think that all spells that need that kind of treatment
> would benefit from the same technique w0rf uses.
I was more thinking along the lines of keeping the main grimoires clean
and not mixing multiple architectures into them and making the whole
cross-compilation issue an optional path... not something installed
when everything else is...
> Well, go to leave for the weekend - and since I have one marriage to
> attend to, no free time this weekend for me...
Hope everything goes well and don't get too debauched at the pre-wedding
partying if I understand the event happenings :)
Regards
Jeremy
--
========================================================================
____,,,^..^,,,__________________________________________________________
'Belxjander Serechai'
AmigaOS 3.5 / Amiga A4000 A3640 040 Desktop,2MB(Chip),16MB(Fast)
AmigaOS Development
SourceMage GNU/Linux Development
========================================================================
========================================================================
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Source Mage Alpha ISO
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Source Mage Alpha ISO, Mads Laursen, 09/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Source Mage Alpha ISO,
Jose Bernardo Silva, 09/04/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Source Mage Alpha ISO,
David Kowis, 09/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Source Mage Alpha ISO, Jose Bernardo Silva, 09/04/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Source Mage Alpha ISO,
Eric Sandall, 09/04/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Source Mage Alpha ISO,
Jose Bernardo Silva, 09/04/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Source Mage Alpha ISO,
Duane Malcolm, 09/04/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Source Mage Alpha ISO, Duane Malcolm, 09/04/2003
-
[SM-Discuss] Cross-Building - why not do a Cross-Build meta-spell ?,
Belxjander Serechai, 09/05/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Cross-Building - why not do a Cross-Build meta-spell ?,
Jose Bernardo Silva, 09/05/2003
- [SM-Discuss] Re: Cross-Building - why not do a Cross-Build meta-spell ?, Belxjander Serechai, 09/05/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Cross-Building - why not do a Cross-Build meta-spell ?,
Jose Bernardo Silva, 09/05/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Source Mage Alpha ISO,
Duane Malcolm, 09/04/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Source Mage Alpha ISO,
Jose Bernardo Silva, 09/04/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Source Mage Alpha ISO,
David Kowis, 09/04/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.