sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Eric Schabell <eschabell AT sourcemage.org>
- To: Duane Malcolm <d.malcolm AT auckland.ac.nz>, Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] devel / stable versions
- Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 10:28:50 +0200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> On Saturday July 12 2003 07:27, Duane Malcolm wrote:
> Hamish Greig wrote:
> >Someone correct me if i am wrong but the reason we have multiple grimoires
> > is to provide stability. Contents of stable grimoire are KNOWN to work in
> > combination with each other. How would version dependancies be sorted
> > out with a STABILITY system ?
> >IE.
> >If stable grimoire mozilla needs gtk+2 2.4.2 then that is the GTK+2
> > version in stable. If mozilla 1.5 needs gtk+2 2.4.9 how does a stability
> > rating help this ? Stability that is reliant on so many other other
> > packages cant be quantified so simply IMHO.
>
> Good point and you are right versioning may solve this problem.
>
Versioning is done in Gentoo and it is a big pain / complaint from the users
that it is a mess... I would not be for adopting it here.
> I guess one way to get the ball rolling is to have a simple/basic
> feedback system. This would include the userid, cpu architecture, which
> grimoire used, a list of spell installed with version numbers and maybe
> the failed spells. We could sumbit these manually and generate stats
> from all the reports.
>
This is always interesting...
After reading this thread for awhile, that is all I wanted to say.
- --
/*
* Eric D. Schabell M.Sc.
* Project Lead Source Mage GNU/Linux
*
* SourceMage: http://www.sourcemage.org
* Shopping: http://www.cafeshops.com/sourcemage
* irc.freenode.net (#sourcemage)
* nick -> erics
*/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/D8bCruUhvfIGbDIRAmFwAJ0e4XndqrKILvob7+2IdmLGBMOaPwCgpcS1
/1ufSQBHKg9SCe5oBblCGA8=
=jDjq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] devel / stable versions
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] devel / stable versions,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 07/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] devel / stable versions,
Geoffrey Derber, 07/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] devel / stable versions,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 07/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] devel / stable versions,
Hamish Greig, 07/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] devel / stable versions,
Jason Flatt, 07/11/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] devel / stable versions, Hamish Greig, 07/11/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] devel / stable versions, Duane Malcolm, 07/11/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] devel / stable versions, Hamish Greig, 07/11/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] devel / stable versions, Duane Malcolm, 07/12/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] devel / stable versions, Hamish Greig, 07/12/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] devel / stable versions, Eric Schabell, 07/12/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] devel / stable versions,
Jason Flatt, 07/11/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] devel / stable versions,
Hamish Greig, 07/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] devel / stable versions,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 07/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] devel / stable versions,
Geoffrey Derber, 07/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] devel / stable versions,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 07/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] devel / stable versions,
Geoffrey Derber, 07/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] devel / stable versions,
Geoffrey Derber, 07/11/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] devel / stable versions, Eric Sandall, 07/11/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] devel / stable versions, Duane Malcolm, 07/11/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] devel / stable versions,
Geoffrey Derber, 07/11/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] devel / stable versions, Jason Flatt, 07/11/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.