sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: "Jose Bernardo Silva" <jbs AT bandos.homelinux.com>
- To: Geoffrey Derber <Geoffrey.Derber AT Trinity.edu>, Robin Cook <rcook AT wyrms.net>
- Cc: Source Mage - Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>, Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] New grimoires available!
- Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 18:29:46 +0000
Well,
Just coming back from my holiday and still having a couple hundred emails to
look thru, I just wanted to add that a spell might probably need to be moved
out of my section/grimoire and into the main grimoires. J2sdk (or j2sdk-bin)
is needed by quite a few spells, as I found when I did a sorcery system-update
(btw, why does javamail provide Java?). But it is a non-free spell, needing
the download of the source files directly from Sun. So, what to do for this
one (and others like it)? Should we create a z-nongpl section on the main
grimoires?
---
Jose Bernardo B R Silva | Source Mage GNU/Linux Section Guru
jbernardo AT sourcemage.org | http://www.sourcemage.org
http://counter.li.org #245602
http://cosmos.oninetspeed.pt/jose.bernardo
jbs AT bandos.homelinux.com
---------- Original Message -----------
From: Geoffrey Derber <Geoffrey.Derber AT Trinity.edu>
To: Robin Cook <rcook AT wyrms.net>
Cc: Source Mage - Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>, Eric Sandall
<eric AT sandall.us>
Sent: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 12:08:15 -0500
Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] New grimoires available!
> Robin Cook wrote:
> > If we make gnome a grimoire by itself then that would make it a bit
> > easier to divide up and also find a spell that does X.
> >
> > Then move the spells that have to have gnome, as opposed to gnome being
> > optional, into the gnome grimoire. And move the spells in the gnome
> > section that can be used without gnome need to be moved into the main
> > grimoire such as gtk+2, glib2, imlib, etc.
> >
> > Do any spells use pango without using gnome? If so then pango would
> > need to be moved to the main grimoire.
> >
> > I think I would prefer the seperate grimoire but I can work with it
> > either way.
> >
> > CuZnDragon
> > Robin Cook
>
> I'm not sure we should move gnome out. While I don't mind moving
> non-essentials out, games, z-rejected, and cvs / daily, etc. Gnome
> is one of the essential (at least for people who use gnome) sections
> for getting a system and desktop up and running.
>
> Honestly, I'm beginning to think before we start going any further,
> I think we aught to sit down and plan out what goes where, rules
> for creation of new grimoires, etc. I just don't want to see us go
> grimoire happy and create new ones just because we feel like it and
> for no other reason.
>
> Geoff
>
> something just seems odd about me saying this as I just had my
> section moved out.
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
------- End of Original Message -------
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New grimoires available!
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New grimoires available!,
Dufflebunk, 06/18/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New grimoires available!, Eric Sandall, 06/18/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New grimoires available!,
Wolfgang Scheicher, 06/18/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New grimoires available!, Geoffrey Derber, 06/18/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New grimoires available!,
Robin Cook, 06/18/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New grimoires available!, Arwed von Merkatz, 06/18/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New grimoires available!,
Geoffrey Derber, 06/18/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New grimoires available!,
Eric Sandall, 06/18/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New grimoires available!,
Robin Cook, 06/18/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New grimoires available!, Eric Sandall, 06/18/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New grimoires available!,
Robin Cook, 06/18/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New grimoires available!, Jose Bernardo Silva, 06/18/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New grimoires available!, Jason Flatt, 06/18/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New grimoires available!,
Eric Sandall, 06/18/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New grimoires available!, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/18/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New grimoires available!,
Jason Flatt, 06/18/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New grimoires available!,
Eric Sandall, 06/18/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New grimoires available!, Geoffrey Derber, 06/18/2003
-
Message not available
-
Message not available
- [SM-Discuss] requesting OpenOffice.org binary spell, Derek Moyes, 06/20/2003
-
Message not available
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New grimoires available!,
Eric Sandall, 06/18/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New grimoires available!,
Dufflebunk, 06/18/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New grimoires available!,
Terry Ross, 06/18/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New grimoires available!, Eric Sandall, 06/18/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.