sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Sergey A Lipnevich <sergeyli AT pisem.net>
- To: Adam Clark <adamsgl AT dhbit.ca>
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions
- Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 10:41:17 -0400
Hi Adam,
I tried it, and couldn't compile the kernel. First I couldn't get
"Configure the Kernel" to work, it was spurring a short message and the
coming back to menu. Then, I discovered that there's no kernel sources
in /mnt/root/usr/src, so I untarred them and tried to compile. GCC
wouldn't work in chroot because it needed the absent `cc' or something
like that (cc1 maybe?). There was also no lilo anywhere on /mnt/root/
system, so the instructions on changing lilo.conf are kind of mean ;-).
What I liked is that the GCC not working was GCC 3.2, not 2.95 ;-).
How can I give you a better feedback. Is there a log of installation or
something?
Sergey.
Adam Clark wrote:
>Please try the 1001 ISO.
>
>Theres a ton of updates - the ISO kernel is more modular, and the kernel
>build routine does not use the ISO kernel config - just a few sane defaults.
>
>http://ut.dhbit.ca:27581/schtuff/adam-smgltest-1001-1.iso.bz2
>
>I plan on updating this ISO as soon as sorcery 0.9 is out and appears to be
>'okay'.
>
>
>On Tue, 15 Oct 2002 20:39:55 -0500 (CDT)
>Casey Harkins <charkins AT upl.cs.wisc.edu> wrote:
>
>
>
>>>>> I would think it's better to have a fully modular kernel compiled,
>>>>>then to *think* you have everything you want enabled, only to find
>>>>>for some reason you're kernel isn't compiling, or some important
>>>>>device is not enabled.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>Yeah, I suppose you're right. Especially since "Configure Kernel"
>>>>defaults to no. I guess I'll just get in the habit of removing the
>>>>config from /etc/sorcery/local on my fresh installs.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Well, I also find it annoying when I have to unselect everything,
>>>especially when I know all that I want in there.
>>>
>>>Perhaps we should have an option (default to yes) to copy the ISO's
>>>config for the user?
>>>
>>>
>>This would work too, or maybe an option (default to yes) to use cached
>>configuration. This way a cast -r and answering yes would allow you to get
>>a fresh config without removing files manually.
>>
>>-casey
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>SM-Discuss mailing list
>>SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
>>http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
------------------
Get free mailbox 20 Mb at http://www.hotbox.ru
-
[SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions,
Casey Harkins, 10/15/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions,
Nick Jennings, 10/15/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions,
Casey Harkins, 10/15/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions,
Eric Sandall, 10/15/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions,
Casey Harkins, 10/15/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions,
Adam Clark, 10/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions,
Sergey A Lipnevich, 10/22/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions, Eric Sandall, 10/22/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions, Adam Clark, 10/22/2002
- Re[2]: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions, Mark Andrews, 10/23/2002
- Re: Re[2]: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions, Eric Sandall, 10/23/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions,
Sergey A Lipnevich, 10/22/2002
- Message not available
- Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions, Eric Sandall, 10/23/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions, Dufflebunk, 10/23/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions, Adam Clark, 10/23/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions,
Adam Clark, 10/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions,
Casey Harkins, 10/15/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions,
Eric Sandall, 10/15/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions,
Casey Harkins, 10/15/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions,
Nick Jennings, 10/15/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.