sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: "Eric Sandall" <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: <spencero AT mail.utexas.edu>
- Cc: " Source Mage - Discuss" <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions
- Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 10:02:55 -0700 (PDT)
Spencer Ogden said:
> If I remember correctly this has always been a 'feature'. It made sense
> when Sorcery was usually the second distro on a box, but now that we are
> releasing I think it is a little much to expect users to know they have
> to put a loader in the MBR seperate from the installation process, no
> one else does it that way...
>
> Spencer
>
> On Tuesday 22 October 2002 07:19 pm, Eric Sandall wrote:
>> Good job on the ISO! Went flawlessly for me, I can even use XFS now!
>> One slight problem with LILO, though, it still defaults to a partition
>> for boot, rather than a disk. Is this a bug (perhaps with the lilo
>> spell in my section), or perhaps a "feature" so that LILO won't
>> overwrite a boot loader the user may already have?
>>
>> -One of Four
>> a.k.a. sandalle
Perhaps we should then give more info on the installer? Perhaps in the
menu where you can Optionally Re-configure LILO, and inform the user that
if they want SMGL to install the boot loader for the entire system, change
boot to use /disc instead of /partx, otherwise, leave as is and modify
their normal boot loader (Norton Commander, Windows, GRUB, etc.)
-One of Four
a.k.a. sandalle
--
PGP Key 0x5C8D199A5A317214
Fingerprint=14C0 C194 163E 57CB 0F1B ED87 5C8D 199A 5A31 7214
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux
Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org
http://www.sandall.us/~sandalle | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions,
Nick Jennings, 10/15/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions,
Casey Harkins, 10/15/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions,
Eric Sandall, 10/15/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions,
Casey Harkins, 10/15/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions,
Adam Clark, 10/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions,
Sergey A Lipnevich, 10/22/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions, Eric Sandall, 10/22/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions, Adam Clark, 10/22/2002
- Re[2]: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions, Mark Andrews, 10/23/2002
- Re: Re[2]: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions, Eric Sandall, 10/23/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions,
Sergey A Lipnevich, 10/22/2002
- Message not available
- Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions, Eric Sandall, 10/23/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions, Dufflebunk, 10/23/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions, Adam Clark, 10/23/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions,
Adam Clark, 10/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions,
Casey Harkins, 10/15/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions,
Eric Sandall, 10/15/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions,
Casey Harkins, 10/15/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions,
Nick Jennings, 10/15/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.