sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Adam Clark <adamsgl AT dhbit.ca>
- To: Casey Harkins <charkins AT upl.cs.wisc.edu>
- Cc: eric AT sandall.us, sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions
- Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 11:51:10 -0700
Please try the 1001 ISO.
Theres a ton of updates - the ISO kernel is more modular, and the kernel
build routine does not use the ISO kernel config - just a few sane defaults.
http://ut.dhbit.ca:27581/schtuff/adam-smgltest-1001-1.iso.bz2
I plan on updating this ISO as soon as sorcery 0.9 is out and appears to be
'okay'.
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002 20:39:55 -0500 (CDT)
Casey Harkins <charkins AT upl.cs.wisc.edu> wrote:
> > >> I would think it's better to have a fully modular kernel compiled,
> > >> then to *think* you have everything you want enabled, only to find
> > >> for some reason you're kernel isn't compiling, or some important
> > >> device is not enabled.
> > >
> > >
> > > Yeah, I suppose you're right. Especially since "Configure Kernel"
> > > defaults to no. I guess I'll just get in the habit of removing the
> > > config from /etc/sorcery/local on my fresh installs.
> >
> > Well, I also find it annoying when I have to unselect everything,
> > especially when I know all that I want in there.
> >
> > Perhaps we should have an option (default to yes) to copy the ISO's
> > config for the user?
>
> This would work too, or maybe an option (default to yes) to use cached
> configuration. This way a cast -r and answering yes would allow you to get
> a fresh config without removing files manually.
>
> -casey
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
--
Adam Clark, Chat Section Maintainer, ISO Forger
Grimoire Gurus Cardholding Member
a.k.a. Kinetix on #sourcemage, #grimoire-gurus
http://grimoire-gurus.org
Attachment:
pgpb3GnUHPs5B.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions,
Casey Harkins, 10/15/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions,
Nick Jennings, 10/15/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions,
Casey Harkins, 10/15/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions,
Eric Sandall, 10/15/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions,
Casey Harkins, 10/15/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions,
Adam Clark, 10/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions,
Sergey A Lipnevich, 10/22/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions, Eric Sandall, 10/22/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions, Adam Clark, 10/22/2002
- Re[2]: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions, Mark Andrews, 10/23/2002
- Re: Re[2]: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions, Eric Sandall, 10/23/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions,
Sergey A Lipnevich, 10/22/2002
- Message not available
- Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions, Eric Sandall, 10/23/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions, Dufflebunk, 10/23/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions, Adam Clark, 10/23/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions,
Adam Clark, 10/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions,
Casey Harkins, 10/15/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions,
Eric Sandall, 10/15/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions,
Casey Harkins, 10/15/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] 1.0 iso suggestions,
Nick Jennings, 10/15/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.