sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] New init scripts for testing and feedback
- From: "Eric Sandall" <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] New init scripts for testing and feedback
- Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 12:24:36 -0700 (PDT)
nealbirch said:
> Jose Bernardo Silva wrote:
>> Their changelog has for some time that the detection
>> of the asus as99127f has now been fixed (in cvs) and
>> will be in the next version, so I think they are aware
>> of the problem... But have no release date yet for the
>> 2.6.5 version.
>
> Great. Have to snag what's off cvs, I guess. Mine shows the 2 temp's
> right, but 2 fans and one temp are way off.
>
> There is an issue for this and other spells that when cast put init
> scripts where they belong; whether to copy the default script or the
> function-using scripts. Shouldn't be hard, though, we can add something
> like:
>
> if [ -f /etc/init.d/functions ]; then
> install -m 755 $SCRIPT_DIRECTORY/script-w.sh /etc/init.d/script.sh else
> install -m 755 $SCRIPT_DIRECTORY/script-wo.sh /etc/init.d/script.sh fi
>
> with the appropriate scripts (w = with functions, wo = without) in the
> $SCRIPT_DIRECTORY.
If there are two versions of the script available, shouldn't we just use
the functions script? Why would we want to use the other script? That'll
just make a mess later on, and I see no benefit to doing this. What's
wrong with functions?
-One of Four
a.k.a. sandalle
--
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org
http://www.sandall.us/~sandalle | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-
[SM-Discuss] New init scripts for testing and feedback,
nealbirch, 09/13/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New init scripts for testing and feedback,
Jose Bernardo Silva, 09/14/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New init scripts for testing and feedback,
nealbirch, 09/14/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New init scripts for testing and feedback,
Jose Bernardo Silva, 09/15/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New init scripts for testing and feedback,
nealbirch, 09/16/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New init scripts for testing and feedback,
Jose Bernardo Silva, 09/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New init scripts for testing and feedback,
nealbirch, 09/17/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New init scripts for testing and feedback, Eric Sandall, 09/17/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New init scripts for testing and feedback, Damien Mascord, 09/17/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New init scripts for testing and feedback, Seth Woolley, 09/17/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New init scripts for testing and feedback, nealbirch, 09/17/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New init scripts for testing and feedback, nealbirch, 09/17/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New init scripts for testing and feedback, Eric Sandall, 09/17/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New init scripts for testing and feedback, nealbirch, 09/17/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New init scripts for testing and feedback, nealbirch, 09/18/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New init scripts for testing and feedback, Sergey A Lipnevich, 09/18/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New init scripts for testing and feedback,
nealbirch, 09/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New init scripts for testing and feedback,
Jose Bernardo Silva, 09/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New init scripts for testing and feedback,
nealbirch, 09/16/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New init scripts for testing and feedback,
Jose Bernardo Silva, 09/15/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New init scripts for testing and feedback,
nealbirch, 09/14/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New init scripts for testing and feedback,
Jose Bernardo Silva, 09/14/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.