sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Probably taken care of already...
- From: Phil The Great <cerise AT deepthought.armory.com>
- To: SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Probably taken care of already...
- Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 20:01:53 -0700 (PDT)
On 10 Aug 2002, Dufflebunk wrote:
> Ummm... well... actualy the answer is it depends. The main question that
> has to be answered is where and when is the bottleneck? And is it worth
> the overhead?
True enough.
> In the case of compiling sources, I've heard varying answers. Some say
> that it speeds things up to run make with -j 2 on single processors,
> some say that's total baloney. Personaly, I don't know, and don't
> particularly care. But choice is good and you'll have a chance to find
> out for yourself in a few weeks.
I'm (obviously) of the camp that -j 2 is faster. I typically run -j 4
on littlegreenmen (my dual proc machine).
-Phil/CERisE
-
[SM-Discuss] So much time, so little to do. Hold it. Scratch That. Reverse it. OK.,
Ryan Abrams, 08/10/2002
-
[SM-Discuss] Probably taken care of already...,
Phil The Great, 08/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Probably taken care of already...,
Spencer Ogden, 08/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Probably taken care of already...,
Phil The Great, 08/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Probably taken care of already...,
Dufflebunk, 08/10/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Probably taken care of already..., Phil The Great, 08/10/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Probably taken care of already..., Julian v. Bock, 08/12/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Probably taken care of already...,
Dufflebunk, 08/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Probably taken care of already...,
Phil The Great, 08/10/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Probably taken care of already..., Dufflebunk, 08/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Probably taken care of already...,
Spencer Ogden, 08/10/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] So much time, so little to do. Hold it. Scratch That. Reverse it. OK., Jason Flatt, 08/16/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] So much time, so little to do. Hold it. Scratch That. Reverse it. OK., Jon Svendsen, 08/16/2002
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] So much time, so little to do. Hold it. Scratch That. Reverse it. OK.,
Chris Brien, 08/10/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] So much time, so little to do. Hold it. Scratch That. Reverse it. OK., Ryan Abrams, 08/10/2002
-
[SM-Discuss] Probably taken care of already...,
Phil The Great, 08/10/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.