sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Probably taken care of already...
- From: Phil The Great <cerise AT deepthought.armory.com>
- To: Spencer Ogden <spencero AT mail.utexas.edu>
- Cc: SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Probably taken care of already...
- Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 17:59:14 -0700 (PDT)
Absolutely. Parallel algorithms often work better than the traditional
serial algorithms on uniprocessors. A cursory reading of how to properly
use threads is an excellent way to acquaint one's self with the whys and
hows.
Great to hear about the parallel feature 8) I may consider an early
upgrade to the newest available sorcery.
-Phil/CERisE
On Sat, 10 Aug 2002, Spencer Ogden wrote:
> Is there any reason that a uniproccessor syste would benfit from parrallel
> compilation. It does't seem like one compilation processes has any trouple
> using 100% CPU...
>
>
> Spencer
-
[SM-Discuss] So much time, so little to do. Hold it. Scratch That. Reverse it. OK.,
Ryan Abrams, 08/10/2002
-
[SM-Discuss] Probably taken care of already...,
Phil The Great, 08/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Probably taken care of already...,
Spencer Ogden, 08/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Probably taken care of already...,
Phil The Great, 08/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Probably taken care of already...,
Dufflebunk, 08/10/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Probably taken care of already..., Phil The Great, 08/10/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Probably taken care of already..., Julian v. Bock, 08/12/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Probably taken care of already...,
Dufflebunk, 08/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Probably taken care of already...,
Phil The Great, 08/10/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Probably taken care of already..., Dufflebunk, 08/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Probably taken care of already...,
Spencer Ogden, 08/10/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] So much time, so little to do. Hold it. Scratch That. Reverse it. OK., Jason Flatt, 08/16/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] So much time, so little to do. Hold it. Scratch That. Reverse it. OK., Jon Svendsen, 08/16/2002
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] So much time, so little to do. Hold it. Scratch That. Reverse it. OK.,
Chris Brien, 08/10/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] So much time, so little to do. Hold it. Scratch That. Reverse it. OK., Ryan Abrams, 08/10/2002
-
[SM-Discuss] Probably taken care of already...,
Phil The Great, 08/10/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.