sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Probably taken care of already...
- From: Spencer Ogden <spencero AT mail.utexas.edu>
- To: SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Probably taken care of already...
- Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 17:00:33 -0500
Is there any reason that a uniproccessor syste would benfit from parrallel
compilation. It does't seem like one compilation processes has any trouple
using 100% CPU...
Spencer
On Saturday 10 August 2002 04:25 pm, Phil The Great wrote:
> Is there a way to get Sorcery working in parallel rather than series? I
> just got back to my system a couple of days ago and, after a
> misadventure with an old iso and _several_ misadventures with the new
> one, I'm slowly watching things roll by in series.
>
> Is there an option in the works for this for happy-pappy SMP people like
> me?
>
> -Phil/CERisE
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
-
[SM-Discuss] So much time, so little to do. Hold it. Scratch That. Reverse it. OK.,
Ryan Abrams, 08/10/2002
-
[SM-Discuss] Probably taken care of already...,
Phil The Great, 08/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Probably taken care of already...,
Spencer Ogden, 08/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Probably taken care of already...,
Phil The Great, 08/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Probably taken care of already...,
Dufflebunk, 08/10/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Probably taken care of already..., Phil The Great, 08/10/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Probably taken care of already..., Julian v. Bock, 08/12/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Probably taken care of already...,
Dufflebunk, 08/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Probably taken care of already...,
Phil The Great, 08/10/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Probably taken care of already..., Dufflebunk, 08/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Probably taken care of already...,
Spencer Ogden, 08/10/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] So much time, so little to do. Hold it. Scratch That. Reverse it. OK., Jason Flatt, 08/16/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] So much time, so little to do. Hold it. Scratch That. Reverse it. OK., Jon Svendsen, 08/16/2002
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] So much time, so little to do. Hold it. Scratch That. Reverse it. OK.,
Chris Brien, 08/10/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] So much time, so little to do. Hold it. Scratch That. Reverse it. OK., Ryan Abrams, 08/10/2002
-
[SM-Discuss] Probably taken care of already...,
Phil The Great, 08/10/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.