Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

permaculture - [permaculture] Fw: Chemtrails

permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: permaculture

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: <fdnokes@hotmail.com>
  • To: <cvforum@googlegroups.com>, "permaculture" <permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org>, <bdnow@yahoogroups.com>
  • Subject: [permaculture] Fw: Chemtrails
  • Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 09:45:20 -0700

MP Anita NevilleHere is a copy of a message that my friend sent to her
federal rep.


Dear ______, Member of Parliament,

It would be nice to hear that detailed questions about the proliferate
aircraft condensation trails were brought forward to our Canadian Parliament.
Below, I have included the Avio News World Aeronautical Press Agency link and
the list of very relevant questions.
Can you inform me on the history of this matter in relation to Parliamentary
action that has ever been taken?

Sincerely,

Concerned Citizen


http://www.avionews.com/index.php?corpo=see_news_home.php&news_id=1077601&pagina_chiamante=index.php


European Parliament: question on aircraft condensation trails which no longer
only contain water

Strasbourg, France - By Erik Meijer (GUE/NGL)
(WAPA) - "Written question E-2455/07
by Erik Meijer (GUE/NGL)
to the Commission

Subject: aircraft condensation trails which no longer only contain water but
cause persistent milky veils, possibly due to the presence of barium,
aluminium and iron

1) Is the Commission aware that, since 1999, members of the public in Canada
and the USA have been complaining about the growing presence in the air of
aircraft condensation trails of a new type, which sometimes persist for hours
and which spread far more widely than in the past, creating milky veils which
are dubbed 'aerial obscuration', and that the new type has particularly come
to people's attention because it is so different from the short, pencil-thin
white contrails which have been a familiar sight ever since jet engines came
into use and which remain visible for 20 minutes at most and can only be
produced if steam condenses on dust particles due to low temperatures and
high humidity?

2) Is the Commission aware that investigations by these complainants,
observations by pilots and statements by government bodies increasingly
suggest that what is happening is that aircraft are emitting into dry air
small particles consisting of barium, aluminium and iron, a phenomenon which
in public debate in America has come to be known as chemtrails?

3) Unlike contrails, chemtrails are not an inevitable by-product of modern
aviation. Does the Commission know, therefore, what is the purpose of
artificially emitting these Earth-derived substances into the Earth's
atmosphere? Does it help to cause rain, benefit telecommunications or combat
climate change?

4) To what extent are aerial obscuration and chemtrails now also being
employed in the air over Europe, bearing in mind that many people here too
are now convinced that the phenomenon is becoming increasingly common and are
becoming concerned about the fact that little is so far known about it and
there is no public information on the subject? Who initiates this spraying
and how is it funded?

5) Apart from the intended benefits of emitting substances into the air, is
the Commission aware of any possible disadvantages it may have for the
environment, public health, aviation and TV reception?

6) What is being done to prevent individual European states or businesses
from taking measures unilaterally whose crossborder impact other States or
citizens' organisations may regard as undesirable? Is coordination already
taking place with regard to this? Is the EU playing a part in it, or does the
Commission anticipate a future role, and what are the Commission's objectives
in this connection?". (Avionews)
(006) 070730160329-1077601
(World Aeronautical Press Agency - 2007-07-30 04:03 pm)








------ End of Forwarded Message




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page