Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

permaculture - Re: [permaculture] Permaculture wikis & making a major impact

permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: permaculture

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Chris Watkins <chriswaterguy@appropedia.org>
  • To: permaculture <permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [permaculture] Permaculture wikis & making a major impact
  • Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 17:24:48 +1100

On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 17:11, Lawrence F. London, Jr. <
venaurafarm@bellsouth.net> wrote:

>
> > *Note that forks aren't actually encouraged in open source or open
> knowledge
> > projects, in most cases, but the freedom to fork is an important one.
>
> Why is that not encouraged.


It is allowed because freedom is important, and sometimes forks lead to
successful projects. It is discouraged because it usually doesn't lead to
anything - so at least it deserves some deep thinking before taking the
plunge.

Poorly planned forks, or forks where the issues could have been resolved
within the original project, lead to a loss of synergy, a spreading and
dissipation of the creative energy.



> I need to google the term to find out more
> but forks sound like they could be just the thing for some people in
> certain circumstances. I can see that locating a fork in a new wiki
> elsewhere might not be good or necessary if the author can make the
> structural and data changes he wants in the original wiki to exactly
> suit the needs of his special development effort, thus keeping things
> "at home".
>


Yes, google it, and yes, there is a time for forking.


> If a wiki had a large farming section and I was only interested in
> biological farming and it contained a well developed section on that
> topic and there was also a large area on conventional agriculture there
> that I had no control over I might well want to start a fork on another
> wiki dedicated completely to biological farming. That would make good
> sense. Artistic license...


"that I had no control over " - I'm not sure what you have in mind. In an
open wiki that has maintained a collaborative, supportive spirit, you would
usually be able to contribute, but no one person has control.

Which reminds me of Bob's comments about Wikipedia, which is not so friendly
these days. Appropedia is certainly *much *friendlier, and with help from
the broader community, we hope to make it even more friendly and supportive.

--
Chris Watkins

Appropedia.org - Sharing knowledge to build rich, sustainable lives.

blogs.appropedia.org
identi.ca/appropedia
twitter.com/appropedia




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page