pcplantdb@lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: pcplantdb
List archive
- From: John Schinnerer <john@eco-living.net>
- To: pcplantdb@lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [pcplantdb] synthesis[17][8.26.04]
- Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 21:23:36 +0000
Aloha,
It's Sunday! Well, still Sunday in my time zone anyhow. Only about ten minutes of it left in PST.
...you requested that everyone create an account on the interim
bugzilla and give you feed back. Can you please be a bit more specific about
what you want from us and how we are supposed to do it?
Go here:
https://www.arashi.com/bugzilla/
Click on the 'Open a new bugzilla account' link
Follow instructions on new account page
An e-mail is used as account login because the system automatically notifies appropriate persons of new bugs, fixed bugs, etc. using that e-mail. So use an actual working e-mail address that you will be checking regularly.
This interim bugzilla system is completely private (and SSL-secure to boot) so your e-mail address will be exposed to no one other than the rest of us, who already have it anyway.
So, do we want to use:
a) wiki
b) Schinnerer’s domain
I'm not offering my domain for shared workspace.
I'm saying that I will simply link from current and/or future shared workspaces to documents hosted on my domain, so that if the shared workspace moves, changes, etc. I don't have to re-post (and potentially re-format, etc.) all the stuff I put up. At worst I just have to re-link.
c) Whatever Rich presented
Rich is talking about a unit testing tool, not shared workspace.
Questions to answer:
a) what are we going to use this workspace for?
Project documentation of all sorts is my main thought.
Specs
FAQs
Wishlists
etc. ??
b) What are our needs regarding the workspace?
1) I want it to be able to manage document uploads of common standardized formats (plain text at the least, RTF would be nice - what else?) without needing the user to do anything but select the file and upload it.
2) It should also support auto-annotation of group-work documents, so that when we are collaborating on something (a spec, a decision list, whatever) our changes and additions are automatically marked with date/time and contributor ID.
c) Ultimately, what do we want out of a shared web workspace?
Support easy posting of standard format static documents.
Support auto-annotated group work on docuemnts in progress.
Not to stoke the flames, but now I’m curious – were wikis originally named
after the Hawaiian word, or is it an acronym or something?
Yeah, originally someone applied the Hawaiian word. There's a general wiki FAQ somewhere in cyberspace that has the origin story.
1. relax. breathe. smile. Love hg.
2. Read this project plan
3. feedback regarding Chad’s and Lawrence’s latest proposals regarding
the
ZOPE/Ibiblio issue
4. Update me on your status regarding your tasks
5. Send me any ideas you have for potential funders (i.e. Lawrence
recommended
the Noble Foundation and Rich sent me a list – these suggestions are super
helpful for me)
6. Respond to the questions below
7. Create a bugzilla account at https://www.arashi.com/bugzilla/, study
the
info Schinnerer puts up there regarding testing and bug writing, and respond
to him with feedback
8. please send me questions you have for Ibiblio so I can compile a list
· John S.
Don't have any funder suggestions.
1. upkeep interim Bugzilla set-up on Arashi, create permanent one when
we are
ready
Interim bugzilla is available for user account creation and experimentation - see info above for link and instructions.
2. look into customization options with John H.
In progress.
3. teach others how to create and use their user accounts at
https://www.arashi.com/bugzilla/
Account creation info above.
Read through Bugzilla help links and play around with it - create a bug or two, query bug database, ask me questions if something is unfathomable.
4. once we are ready, set up more permanent issue tracking system and
whatever
data/parameters/customizations are necessary to start using it on our project
Pending us being ready and pending result of 8. below.
5. prepare and posts FAQs and other documentation on use of issue
tracker and
general software test/QA procedures and guidelines – due late the week of
August 30
Partly done. More to come late next week. Bugzilla help page on writing bugs is pretty well done, covers most points I would make. I will review it and add some details and/or points relevant to this particular project.
6. post this info on the shared web workspace (whether wiki or
otherwise) for
feedback – please tell us what kind of feedback you would like!
Is it helpful?
Is it comprehensible?
Too much jargon, or good plain English?
What else do you need and/or want to know about testing, about using an issue tracker, about software quality?
And anything else that comes up for you in looking at the docs and trying out bugzilla.
7. organize for user test of first “build” (to start happening weekly in
1-3 weeks?)
Pending start of development and development progress.
8. resolve ZOPE/Ibiblio/Bugzilla issue (whatever you have been asking
Ibiblio
about)
In progress - JohnH is following up with technical questions.
· Chad and Rich...
8. issue tracker working
This is bugzilla - this part of 8. is on my list, you can take it off theirs.
Questions
1. Shared Web Workspace
My answers above.
2. Are we ready to post to the PC lists? Or should we wait until we
have a
structure to embed data into? Let me know so I can edit the post with the
feedback you gave me.
Depends on what participation we want from outside this list.
If we have no structure(s)/person(s) in place to manage input from the PC list and we actually get a bunch, then what?
Afaik we don't have that in place at present.
If we solicit input and get some, how will it be assimilated into our ongoing attributes discussion on this list, creation of phase one spec, etc.?
--
John Schinnerer - MA, Whole Systems Design
------------------------------------------
- Eco-Living -
Whole Systems Design Services
People - Place - Learning - Integration
john@eco-living.net
http://eco-living.net
-
Re: [pcplantdb] Agreement, consensus
, (continued)
-
Re: [pcplantdb] Agreement, consensus,
John Schinnerer, 08/28/2004
- Re: [pcplantdb] Agreement, consensus, Lawrence F. London, Jr., 08/28/2004
-
Re: [pcplantdb] Agreement, consensus,
Chad Knepp, 08/28/2004
- Re: [pcplantdb] Agreement, consensus, Lawrence F. London, Jr., 08/28/2004
- Re: [pcplantdb] Agreement, consensus, John Schinnerer, 08/29/2004
-
Re: [pcplantdb] Agreement, consensus,
John Schinnerer, 08/28/2004
- Re: [pcplantdb] Agreement, consensus, Chad Knepp, 08/28/2004
-
Re: [pcplantdb] Object relational mappers,
Richard Morris, 08/29/2004
- Re: [pcplantdb] Object relational mappers, Chad Knepp, 08/29/2004
- Re: [pcplantdb] synthesis[17][8.26.04], John Howe, 08/29/2004
- Re: [pcplantdb] synthesis[17][8.26.04], John Schinnerer, 08/30/2004
-
Re: [pcplantdb] synthesis[17][8.26.04],
Stephanie Gerson, 08/27/2004
-
Re: [pcplantdb] synthesis[17][8.26.04],
Chad Knepp, 08/27/2004
- Re: [pcplantdb] synthesis[17][8.26.04], Lawrence F. London, Jr., 08/28/2004
-
Re: [pcplantdb] synthesis[17][8.26.04],
Chad Knepp, 08/27/2004
-
Re: [pcplantdb] synthesis[17][8.26.04],
Stephanie Gerson, 08/28/2004
-
Re: [pcplantdb] synthesis[17][8.26.04] - specs,
John Schinnerer, 08/29/2004
- Re: [pcplantdb] synthesis[17][8.26.04] - specs, Chad Knepp, 08/29/2004
-
Re: [pcplantdb] synthesis[17][8.26.04] - specs,
John Schinnerer, 08/29/2004
-
Re: [pcplantdb] synthesis[17][8.26.04],
Stephanie Gerson, 08/30/2004
- Re: [pcplantdb] synthesis[17][8.26.04], John Schinnerer, 08/31/2004
-
Re: [pcplantdb] Agreement, consensus,
John Schinnerer, 08/28/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.