Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

livingontheland - Re: [Livingontheland] Why industrial farming may be the most INefficient farming method

livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Healthy soil and sustainable growing

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "John D'hondt" <dhondt@eircom.net>
  • To: "Healthy soil and sustainable growing" <livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [Livingontheland] Why industrial farming may be the most INefficient farming method
  • Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 19:19:42 -0000


Exactly my idea too.
John


Again I agree. But I think they're a fair opening to the subject for many of us. We do have over 500 on this list & not all will agree - right? And I'm on the "hard landing" side of the debate. True, the Middle Ages were as u mention. But there's more to take issue with.

Cultures don't just simply drop back to life in a previous age. People knew how to live where they were with what little they had. Problem is we don't know how to live as they did (or what will happen in a hundred other cultures worldwide that we don't pay attention to). In The Waning of the Middle Ages, Huizinga in 1919 described life in northern Europe. Main thing to me is they thought differently, had a different world view, customs, habits, communications. Less individualism, everyone part of a group of some kind, village, family etc. Anyone wandering or living alone might be thought insane or something. These post-apocalyptic fictions can't begin to deal with the utter foreignness of a lost society. And some predictions now can't begin to convey the trauma, the shock of losing so much of what we think makes us civilized. Someone once said civilization is only a thin veneer over humankind. Imagine universal PTSD on top of everything else.

Personally I believe there may be hundreds of more or less indigenous societies today that we know little of, and some may be better adapted already to harsher climates and lack of modern thinking and living.

----------

On 3/28/2014 4:25 PM, John D'hondt wrote:
It is just with these two links that I have some problem Paul. I fear they are cruelly over optimistic.
We already spoke about how much run in time is needed before you can realistically expect to be able to live of a piece of land by growing crops.
But further let's just look around us and at the diseased and medicated masses. I can not imagine that even a small part of those will be able to do anything useful for themselves except maybe kill off those of us who can grow food.
Also in the Middle ages the earth was still mostly pristine and fertile and without persistent environmental toxins and radioactive contamination. And the population was much smaller. And even then there were famines.

I feel quite pessimistic about "going over the cliff". We are not going to land very softly and just pick ourselves up I'm afraid.
I think it likely we are already in freefall and from time to time as I tumble as in a dream I can see glimpses of sharp rocks at the bottom.
John

The World After Industrial Civilization Goes, Usher in the "new" economics of local self-sufficiency
http://www.culturechange.org/cms/content/view/785/1/

We will go kicking and screaming down the path to the new Middle Ages as fossil fuels desert us
http://sunweber.blogspot.com/2011/05/new-middle-ages.html

----------------

_______________________________________________
Livingontheland mailing list
Livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/livingontheland


---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
protection is active.
http://www.avast.com





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page