livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Healthy soil and sustainable growing
List archive
- From: Kate Spinner <kespinner@gmail.com>
- To: Healthy soil and sustainable growing <livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [Livingontheland] Grapes of Wrath the sequel
- Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 23:56:25 -0400
There's a 55-acre farm in Charlotte County, Florida that supports a family and feeds hundreds of people an amazingly diverse array of vegetables for nine months out of the year. They have six apprentices to help them, but based on what I see the farm bring to the farmer's market, I'm thinking it could easily support 50 people even if only a third of those people were actually there year-round. http://www.wordenfarm.com/
On Oct 11, 2009, at 11:32 PM, Tradingpost wrote:
You're probably right, one acre through the seasons. But I have to agree totally, for 50 acres to support 50 people, they definitely would have to be on those acres. I think labor and transportation factors come in there. I think they'd have to be doing the work and not be someplace else. More thoughts on this?
paul tradingpost@lobo.net
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 10/11/2009 at 5:29 PM Dan Conine wrote:
My father acquired a 1300 acre farm for 100 bucks an acre in 1975. Being
Always appropriate, isn't it. As for us here we grow for markets on less
than a quarter acre. It's not a living of course, and with a short
frost-free season, poor soil to start with and very low rainfall it's too
much work for us.
mostly swamp and tundra, it barely supported 100 milking head and the
other supporting cast (pigs, calves, heifers, etc). I thought of it as a
massive farm.
I now own 50 acres, and I have learned to think of it as a massive
place. It is a size which requires machinery, but even with machinery,
one person cannot be on the whole place in their mind. Regardless of the
labor, I have found that an acre is as much as one person can properly
keep in useful focus throughout the seasons. More than that and the
details suffer.
I now understand how this farm could be 50 families' source of food and
income, but they would have to BE here in order for it to happen. We
have spent the last 100 years destroying that opportunity with petroleum
and money as motive.
Dan C.
_______________________________________________
Livingontheland mailing list
Livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/livingontheland
_______________________________________________
Livingontheland mailing list
Livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/livingontheland
-
Re: [Livingontheland] Grapes of Wrath the sequel,
Dan Conine, 10/11/2009
-
Message not available
-
Re: [Livingontheland] Grapes of Wrath the sequel,
Tradingpost, 10/11/2009
-
Re: [Livingontheland] Grapes of Wrath the sequel,
Kate Spinner, 10/11/2009
-
Message not available
-
Message not available
-
Re: [Livingontheland] Grapes of Wrath the sequel,
Tradingpost, 10/12/2009
- Re: [Livingontheland] Grapes of Wrath the sequel, Norma Sutton, 10/12/2009
-
Re: [Livingontheland] Grapes of Wrath the sequel,
Tradingpost, 10/12/2009
-
Message not available
-
Message not available
-
Re: [Livingontheland] Grapes of Wrath the sequel,
Kate Spinner, 10/11/2009
-
Re: [Livingontheland] Grapes of Wrath the sequel,
Tradingpost, 10/11/2009
-
Message not available
- Re: [Livingontheland] Grapes of Wrath the sequel, Emery Mitchamore, 10/12/2009
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [Livingontheland] Grapes of Wrath the sequel,
mdnagel, 10/12/2009
- Re: [Livingontheland] Grapes of Wrath the sequel, Pumpkin Lady, 10/12/2009
- Re: [Livingontheland] Grapes of Wrath the sequel, Norma Sutton, 10/12/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.