Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

[Mark Turner <markt AT siteseers.net>]

Michael Czeiszperger wrote:
> One article isn't a ream, and it by itself doesn't meet my first  
> requirement: repeatable by independent sources.
>
>   
True, one source is not "reams," nor was it meant to be. I lack the time 
to sort through eighty years (!) of scientific parapsychology research 
to provide examples so I provided one off the top of my head that met 
two of your three criteria. As for your first criteria, anyone can 
reproduce these effects using a simple, double-blind protocol.

I'll be happy to send you more references offlist (and outside of work 
hours), if you'd like.

Cheers,
Mark