Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

internetworkers - Re: [internetworkers] House LAN ?

internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: matusiak <dave AT matusiak.org>
  • To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [internetworkers] House LAN ?
  • Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 15:08:07 -0400

I still can't believe a builder/contractor would be dumb enough to tell a customer "No, you can't have that."

WTF were they thinking? No, really! WTF were they thinking?

Mass info sharing will be the demise of the non-customer-friendly business and ham-fisted entrepreneur. Long live the Internets!


On Jul 18, 2006, at 1:49 PM, Tanner Lovelace wrote:

On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, Jim Ray wrote:
cat6 is all fine and dandy. however, i paid $450 per 1000' box due to
customer specs for cat6 plenum cable and pay $55 per 1000' box for cat5e
non plenum. the only difference technically is that cat6 goes up to 10
Gb. cat5e takes you to 1 Gb. not many folks have 10 Gb components
available.

You do realize the difference between plenum and non-plenum cable, right?
Only plenum cable is rated for going inside the walls. Non-plenum cable
should NEVER be run inside walls. As wikipedia puts it:

"Plenum cable is jacketed with a fire-retardant plastic jacket of either a
low-smoke polyvinyl chloride (PVC) {patented 1987} or a fluorinated
ethylene polymer (FEP)."

Ref: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plenum_cable

So, there's a reason plenum cable is so much more expensive. Your
comparison of plenum versus non-plenum cable is at best disingenuous
and at worst fraud. Plenum must be used in plenum spaces or you risk
having to rip it all out and put new stuff in at dramatically higher costs.

Tanner






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page