internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
Re: [internetworkers] Why almost everything the Federal Goverment does is unconstitutional
- From: Phillip Rhodes <mindcrime AT cpphacker.co.uk>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Why almost everything the Federal Goverment does is unconstitutional
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 01:18:55 -0500
thomas wrote:
Promoting the General Welfare is not a specific Power, but it is the
underlying reason for the Powers laid out in Article I. A strict
reading of Article I would make it nearly impossible for Congress to
provide for the general welfare.
Hah... you're a sneaky one. No wonder you're a lawyer! I just now
noticed that you switched words on us. The preamble reads "promote the general Welfare," not "provide the general Welfare."
Promoting something and providing something are two different things, as I'm sure you're well aware. I spend a lot of time promoting the
Libertarian Party... it wouldn't even make sense to speak of me
"providing the Libertarian Party."
TTYL,
Phil
--
Don't blame me, I voted for Badnarik
Free America - Vote Libertarian
www.lp.org
-
[internetworkers] Why almost everything the Federal Goverment does is unconstitutional,
Phillip Rhodes, 02/13/2005
-
Re: [internetworkers] Why almost everything the Federal Goverment does is unconstitutional,
Phillip Rhodes, 02/13/2005
-
Re: [internetworkers] Why almost everything the Federal Goverment does is unconstitutional,
thomas, 02/14/2005
- Re: [internetworkers] Why almost everything the Federal Goverment does is unconstitutional, Sil Greene, 02/14/2005
- Re: [internetworkers] Why almost everything the Federal Goverment does is unconstitutional, Phillip Rhodes, 02/14/2005
- Re: [internetworkers] Why almost everything the Federal Goverment does is unconstitutional, Phillip Rhodes, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [internetworkers] Why almost everything the Federal Goverment does is unconstitutional,
thomas, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [internetworkers] Why almost everything the Federal Goverment does is unconstitutional,
thomas, 02/13/2005
-
Re: [internetworkers] Why almost everything the Federal Goverment does is unconstitutional,
Phillip Rhodes, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [internetworkers] Why almost everything the Federal Goverment does is unconstitutional,
thomas, 02/14/2005
- Re: [internetworkers] Why almost everything the Federal Goverment does is unconstitutional, Phillip Rhodes, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [internetworkers] Why almost everything the Federal Goverment does is unconstitutional,
Phillip Rhodes, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [internetworkers] Why almost everything the Federal Goverment does is unconstitutional,
zman, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [internetworkers] Why almost everything the Federal Goverment does is unconstitutional,
Phillip Rhodes, 02/14/2005
- Re: [internetworkers] Why almost everything the Federal Goverment does is unconstitutional, zman, 02/14/2005
- Re: [internetworkers] Why almost everything the Federal Goverment does is unconstitutional, Phillip Rhodes, 02/14/2005
- Re: [internetworkers] Why almost everything the Federal Goverment does is unconstitutional, Evan Zimmerman, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [internetworkers] Why almost everything the Federal Goverment does is unconstitutional,
Phillip Rhodes, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [internetworkers] Why almost everything the Federal Goverment does is unconstitutional,
zman, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [internetworkers] Why almost everything the Federal Goverment does is unconstitutional,
thomas, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [internetworkers] Why almost everything the Federal Goverment does is unconstitutional,
Phillip Rhodes, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [internetworkers] Why almost everything the Federal Goverment does is unconstitutional,
Phillip Rhodes, 02/13/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.