internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: "Lance A. Brown" <lance AT bearcircle.net>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: [internetworkers] Re: Draft Hoax
- Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:34:48 -0400
Jeremy Portzer wrote:
On Fri, 2004-04-23 at 11:46, zman wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Tony Spencer wrote:
This draft hoax is nothing more than a hoax. My step-brother just finished
basic training this month. Only 40 were selected out of 100 *volunteers*.
Doesn't seem like the military is having any trouble recruiting.
Sorry to piss in your cornflakes, but it is not a hoax. There are bills in both the house and senate to reinstate the draft. I don't consider that a hoax. But of course if you have some other kind of dictionary you use...
Um, there haven't been any bills introduced. That can be verified.
Not sure this qualifies as "a return of the draft" but it sounds similar. H.R.163 and S.89 are both the "Universal National Service Act of 2003". They were introduced to their respective houses on January 7th 2003. Quoting the opening statement of each:
To provide for the common defense by requiring that all young persons in the United States, including women, perform a period of military service or a period of civilian service in furtherance of the national defense and homeland security, and for other purposes.
Thomas links are:
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c108:2:./temp/~c108ZLSNlZ::
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c108:3:./temp/~c108ZLSNlZ::
I'm not very clueful at reading the status of bills in Thomas, so I'm not sure where these stand.
--[Lance]
--
Celebrate The Circle: http://www.celebratethecircle.org/
Carolina Spirit Quest: http://www.carolinaspiritquest.org/
My LiveJournal: http://www.livejournal.com/users/labrown/
GPG Fingerprint: 409B A409 A38D 92BF 15D9 6EEE 9A82 F2AC 69AC 07B9
-
Re: [internetworkers] Just for fun
, (continued)
- Re: [internetworkers] Just for fun, Steven Champeon, 04/23/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Just for fun, zman, 04/23/2004
- [internetworkers] Re: Just for fun, Lance A. Brown, 04/23/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: Just for fun, zman, 04/23/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: Just for fun, Tanner Lovelace, 04/23/2004
- [internetworkers] Re: Just for fun, Lance A. Brown, 04/23/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: Just for fun, matusiak, 04/23/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: Just for fun, Michael Czeiszperger, 04/23/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] Draft Hoax, Jeremy Portzer, 04/23/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Draft Hoax, Steven Champeon, 04/23/2004
- [internetworkers] Re: Draft Hoax, Lance A. Brown, 04/23/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: Draft Hoax [O.T.], Butch Lazorchak, 04/23/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Just for fun, Ron Thigpen, 04/23/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Just for fun, Tom Caswell, 04/23/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] Just for fun, Tony Spencer, 04/23/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] Just for fun, Tony Spencer, 04/23/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] Just for fun, zman, 04/23/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] Just for fun, K. Jo Garner, 04/23/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.