internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
Re: Users' responsibilities (was Re: [internetworkers] WalMart SunLinux)
- From: Jeremy Portzer <jeremyp AT pobox.com>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: Users' responsibilities (was Re: [internetworkers] WalMart SunLinux)
- Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2004 13:18:09 -0400
On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 12:10, zman wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Apr 2004, Tanner Lovelace wrote:
> > 1. The people putting it on there aren't developers, it's Wal-Mart.
> > 2. The system in question is actually written by sun, so it's entirely
> > possible that they have an incentive to make it user friendly.
> > 3. I don't think it matters though because the people buying the
> > computers aren't likely to be people who have used computers before.
> > See Maria's post for more information on that.
>
> Does that mean it'll use CDE?
Sun discontined development on CDE several years ago and has switched to
Gnome.
--Jeremy
--
/---------------------------------------------------------------------\
| Jeremy Portzer jeremyp AT pobox.com trilug.org/~jeremy |
| GPG Fingerprint: 712D 77C7 AB2D 2130 989F E135 6F9F F7BC CC1A 7B92 |
\---------------------------------------------------------------------/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-
[internetworkers] WalMart Sun Linux,
Alan MacHett, 04/05/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] WalMart Sun Linux,
Ian Meyer, 04/05/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] WalMart Sun Linux,
Alan MacHett, 04/06/2004
-
Users' responsibilities (was Re: [internetworkers] WalMart Sun Linux),
Tanner Lovelace, 04/07/2004
-
RE: Users' responsibilities (was Re: [internetworkers] WalMart Sun Linux),
Bill Geschwind, 04/07/2004
-
Re: Users' responsibilities (was Re: [internetworkers] WalMart Sun Linux),
Tanner Lovelace, 04/07/2004
-
RE: Users' responsibilities (was Re: [internetworkers] WalMart SunLinux),
Bill Geschwind, 04/07/2004
- Re: Users' responsibilities (was Re: [internetworkers] WalMart SunLinux), Tanner Lovelace, 04/07/2004
- Re: Users' responsibilities (was Re: [internetworkers] WalMart SunLinux), zman, 04/07/2004
- Re: Users' responsibilities (was Re: [internetworkers] WalMart SunLinux), Jeremy Portzer, 04/07/2004
- Re: Users' responsibilities (was Re: [internetworkers] WalMart SunLinux), burnett, 04/07/2004
-
RE: Users' responsibilities (was Re: [internetworkers] WalMart SunLinux),
Bill Geschwind, 04/07/2004
-
Re: Users' responsibilities (was Re: [internetworkers] WalMart Sun Linux),
Tanner Lovelace, 04/07/2004
-
RE: Users' responsibilities (was Re: [internetworkers] WalMart Sun Linux),
Bill Geschwind, 04/07/2004
-
Users' responsibilities (was Re: [internetworkers] WalMart Sun Linux),
Tanner Lovelace, 04/07/2004
- Re: Users' responsibilities (was Re: [internetworkers] WalMart Sun Linux), Michael Czeiszperger, 04/07/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] WalMart Sun Linux,
Alan MacHett, 04/06/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] WalMart Sun Linux,
Ian Meyer, 04/05/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] WalMart Sun Linux, Paul Smith, 04/06/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] WalMart Sun Linux,
zman, 04/06/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] WalMart Sun Linux,
Tanner Lovelace, 04/06/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] WalMart Sun Linux,
Sil Greene, 04/06/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] WalMart Sun Linux, zman, 04/06/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] WalMart Sun Linux,
Sil Greene, 04/06/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] WalMart Sun Linux,
Tanner Lovelace, 04/06/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.