internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: Ian Meyer <ianmeyer AT mac.com>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] WalMart Sun Linux
- Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 23:49:43 -0400
Sorry Alan, but...
Years ago, Apple donated thousands of computers to schools for classroom use. The idea was that kids would learn on that Apple's and then when the family went out to buy a computer, they would but an Apple as well. Judging from how many kids go through public schools and how many people have bought Apple computers...I don't think it worked too hot.
Now, getting Linux into the home is a little more of an achievement, but I think that most users will (a) be attracted solely by the price (b) be attracted to the price but "wtf?" about this "Sun Linux" thing and buy a more expensive Windows PC and/or (c) won't really care what it is and not explore it (tinker with the command line) at all.
So as great as it is, IMHO, and as neat as it is to see these being sold, I don't think its going to start a revolution.
~Ian
On Apr 5, 2004, at 11:32 PM, Alan MacHett wrote:
http://edition.cnn.com/2004/TECH/ptech/04/01/wal.mart.linux.ap/ index.html
Wal-Mart offering PCs running Sun's Linux software
Thursday, April 1, 2004 Posted: 1646 GMT (0046 HKT)
SAN JOSE, California (AP) -- In an invasion of Microsoft Corp.'s home
turf, Sun Microsystems Inc.'s version of Linux operating system is now
available on inexpensive personal computers sold at Wal-Mart's online
store.
Linux for the masses. As much as I hate WalMart, if they can put Linux
into the average (which is not to say middle class) household, then kudos
to them. The effect will be neither apparant nor immediate. Mom and Dad
might not necessarily get the advantage or even understand anything beyond
the gui desktop, but imagine the effect 10 years from now of innumerable
households of kids messing around with a command line.
Or should I assume the kids will be just as apathetic or uninterested?
I'd like to be optimistic on this. The issue at hand, though, is the
accessibility. We've been discussing refrigerators and garbage cans that
will reorder food for us, but that kind of technology is meant for and
priced at the middle and upper classes. And I don't mean "meant for" as
in the lower class doesn't deserve it, rather "meant for" as in the people
dreaming up these technologies aren't considering whether or not someone
earning $10k, $15K, or $20k can or would ever use the technology. That, I
believe, is the interesting facet of this Sun-WalMart deal. For $300, not
only can a low-income family obtain a computer, but they can get one
running a "geeky" or "cutting-edge" OS (""... as in the popular mindset).
Anyone care to be optimistic with me?
-Alan
---
Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site! http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
To unsubscribe visit http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
-
[internetworkers] WalMart Sun Linux,
Alan MacHett, 04/05/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] WalMart Sun Linux,
Ian Meyer, 04/05/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] WalMart Sun Linux,
Alan MacHett, 04/06/2004
-
Users' responsibilities (was Re: [internetworkers] WalMart Sun Linux),
Tanner Lovelace, 04/07/2004
-
RE: Users' responsibilities (was Re: [internetworkers] WalMart Sun Linux),
Bill Geschwind, 04/07/2004
-
Re: Users' responsibilities (was Re: [internetworkers] WalMart Sun Linux),
Tanner Lovelace, 04/07/2004
-
RE: Users' responsibilities (was Re: [internetworkers] WalMart SunLinux),
Bill Geschwind, 04/07/2004
- Re: Users' responsibilities (was Re: [internetworkers] WalMart SunLinux), Tanner Lovelace, 04/07/2004
- Re: Users' responsibilities (was Re: [internetworkers] WalMart SunLinux), zman, 04/07/2004
- Re: Users' responsibilities (was Re: [internetworkers] WalMart SunLinux), Jeremy Portzer, 04/07/2004
- Re: Users' responsibilities (was Re: [internetworkers] WalMart SunLinux), burnett, 04/07/2004
-
RE: Users' responsibilities (was Re: [internetworkers] WalMart SunLinux),
Bill Geschwind, 04/07/2004
-
Re: Users' responsibilities (was Re: [internetworkers] WalMart Sun Linux),
Tanner Lovelace, 04/07/2004
-
RE: Users' responsibilities (was Re: [internetworkers] WalMart Sun Linux),
Bill Geschwind, 04/07/2004
-
Users' responsibilities (was Re: [internetworkers] WalMart Sun Linux),
Tanner Lovelace, 04/07/2004
- Re: Users' responsibilities (was Re: [internetworkers] WalMart Sun Linux), Michael Czeiszperger, 04/07/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] WalMart Sun Linux,
Alan MacHett, 04/06/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] WalMart Sun Linux,
Ian Meyer, 04/05/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.