internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: Ian Meyer <ianmeyer AT mac.com>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads
- Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 14:19:41 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
pfft
not only was that so tiny i could hardly read the text, but i stand by what i said.
people would be outraged if shots of arlington were used in ads, I would be outraged if columbine were to be used in ads, and i am outraged that he is using the images of the WTC, where thousands of people died, for political gain.
ian
- -------------------------
What's that file that's attached you ask? Well, its my Gnu Privacy Guard (GnuPG) signature that can be used to authenticate this email. For more information, check out http://www.gnupg.org/(en)/documentation/faqs.html
On Mar 5, 2004, at 2:11 PM, Tony Spencer wrote:
here you go:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
<http://www.georgewbush.com/TVAds/>
-----Original Message-----
From: internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
[mailto:internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf
Of David R.Matusiak
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 2:09 PM
To: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
Subject: Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads
just for reference, i don't have television service (of any
sort), nor do i participate in most major studio media
(movies, Britney, etc).
this does place me at a disadvantage as far as critiquing
these ads, but also i did not have any family members perish
in the 9/11 tragedy.
i think a little sensitivity towards their grieving is in
order. or is that too old fashioned?
as a Compassionate Conservative, i am actually a bit shocked
that he would stoop to this level. and not much shocks me
anymore. but i do like to bitch about the media and its abuses, tho.
On Mar 5, 2004, at 1:26 PM, Tony Spencer wrote:
so we are just supposed to pretend that it didn't happen and wasn'tin this.
the core focus of this president's agenda? the image shown is also
brief and nothing horrific. i really can't see the problem
if you haven't seen the ads you really should take a look.would bash
-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Meyer
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 1:18 PM
To: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
Subject: Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads
the content is of no importance, the fact that the images of those
attacks are being used for political gain is heinous and i
economy andANY canidate that used them.
its unexcusable.
On Mar 5, 2004, at 1:10 PM, Tony Spencer wrote:
have you watched the ads? they actually are about the
environment orjobs. ridiculous. the ads are nothing more than uplifting.
-----Original Message-----
From: David R. Matusiak
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 1:00 PM
To: internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads
well, he certainly can't make commercials about improving the
economy, creating jobs for Americans, or helping the
Jr., diedsenior citizens. whaddya expect him to focus on?? FEAR!! You
must all live in FEAR!!
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/ArticleNews/TPStory/LAC/
20040305/ELECTIONADS05/TPInternational/Americas
"I find it offensive that he has used 9/11 as a pretext for the
election," said Colleen Kelly, whose brother, Bill Kelly
as sayingin the World Trade Center and who has become a leader of the
victims'
movement. For her, "9/11 was a failure of this President to act."
Ron Willett of Walnut Shade, Mo., was quoted by Reuters
so upset,he was disgusted when he saw the ads. Mr. Willett, whose
29-year-old son John Charles was killed, said he is now
"I would vote for Saddam Hussein before I would vote for Bush."
---
Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
To unsubscribe visit
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
---
Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site! http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
To unsubscribe visit http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFASNLNDaRr/N2jLBARAmcBAJ9W5U5oMFU3bavCq4Hik+q00rH+/gCfcFHU
FnmrzJdQ74LjFqubouMZSoA=
=CcSx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads
, (continued)
- Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Rebecca O'Connell, 03/05/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, David R . Matusiak, 03/05/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Sil Greene, 03/05/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Shea Tisdale, 03/05/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Steven Champeon, 03/05/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Shea Tisdale, 03/05/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads,
Tony Spencer, 03/05/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Ian Meyer, 03/05/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads,
David R . Matusiak, 03/05/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Tony Spencer, 03/05/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Steven Champeon, 03/05/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Ian Meyer, 03/05/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Sil Greene, 03/05/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Tanner Lovelace, 03/05/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Tony Spencer, 03/05/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.