internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
[internetworkers] religion in America: was [Marriage and religion]
- From: "Alan MacHett" <machett AT ibiblio.org>
- To: internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [internetworkers] religion in America: was [Marriage and religion]
- Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 15:21:51 -0500 (EST)
In response to childers.paula AT epamail.epa.gov's message(s):
> It appalls me to think our great nation has sunk to even PROPOSING this
> kind of prejudice & pandering; no Western democracy has codified such
> blatant discrimination into their Constitution or foundation of law,
> only places like Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, or some little
> hypersuperstitious backwater in Africa.
>
I know what you meant, but that's awfully prejudicial towards Africa,
given that it can easily be argued that the continent is the way it is
because of centuries or millenia of colonial conquest and rule.
But anyway, some of the most ass-backwards and foaming at the mouth
superstitious people I've met are right here in the good ol' US of A.
An article on p.40 of the December 2003 Scientific American, titled
"Measuring Modernity: The U.S. Is Not Number One" explains that one of the
reasons the US is a bit behind is due to the heavy influence of religion.
"Protestant Europe", such as Sweden, Norway, and the Netherlands ranks
number one. Jordan is listed as the least modern.
The criteria are plotted on an x-y chart. "The first of these dimensions
-- the traditional versus secular-rational scale in the chart -- derives
from attitudes toward religion, respect for authority, and patriotism.
The second dimension -- survival versus self-expression -- derives from
questions about physical security, trust in other people, gender roles,
and personal happiness."
I'd post a link, but SciAm is pay-per-read.
-Alan
-
Re: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion
, (continued)
- Re: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion, Thomas Beckett, 02/06/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion, Shea Tisdale, 02/07/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion, Alan MacHett, 02/05/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion,
childers . paula, 02/05/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion,
Tanner Lovelace, 02/05/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion,
Michael Williams, 02/05/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion, K. Jo Garner, 02/05/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion,
Michael Williams, 02/05/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion,
Tom Boucher, 02/05/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion,
Diana Duncan, 02/05/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion, Ron Thigpen, 02/06/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion,
Diana Duncan, 02/05/2004
-
Message not available
- [internetworkers] religion in America: was [Marriage and religion], Alan MacHett, 02/06/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion,
Tanner Lovelace, 02/05/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion, childers . paula, 02/05/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion,
Alan MacHett, 02/05/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion, Sil Greene, 02/06/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion,
K. Jo Garner, 02/06/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion,
Jim Ray, 02/06/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion,
Maria Winslow, 02/06/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion, Jim Ray, 02/06/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion,
Shea Tisdale, 02/06/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion,
Jim Ray, 02/06/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion, Shea Tisdale, 02/06/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion,
Jim Ray, 02/06/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion,
Maria Winslow, 02/06/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion,
Jim Ray, 02/06/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.