internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: "K. Jo Garner" <kelly AT metalab.unc.edu>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion
- Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 20:36:47 -0500 (EST)
On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, Michael Williams wrote:
->you still want a marriage license, the state is there, theoretically
->impartial and irreligious, ready to do so without passing judgement. I
and ready to collect that just slightly higher tax for married couples.
I don't see how the government couldn't fix the deficit (in any county,
state or federal situation) by just taxing the hell out of marriage. You
pay a decreasing amount of tax based on the years you have been together.
Now that's some incentive for "sticking around".
And gay marriage - hell, there's a whole new revenue stream right there.
Just thinking.
Besides, marriage was long an economic proposition before it was a
religious one.
Cheers
KJ
-
RE: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion
, (continued)
-
RE: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion,
trekkie, 02/06/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion,
Thomas Beckett, 02/06/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion,
Shea Tisdale, 02/07/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion, Jim Ray, 02/07/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion,
Shea Tisdale, 02/07/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion, Thomas Beckett, 02/06/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion, Shea Tisdale, 02/07/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion,
Thomas Beckett, 02/06/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion, Alan MacHett, 02/05/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion,
childers . paula, 02/05/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion,
Tanner Lovelace, 02/05/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion,
Michael Williams, 02/05/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion, K. Jo Garner, 02/05/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion,
Michael Williams, 02/05/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion,
Tom Boucher, 02/05/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion,
Diana Duncan, 02/05/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion, Ron Thigpen, 02/06/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion,
Diana Duncan, 02/05/2004
-
Message not available
- [internetworkers] religion in America: was [Marriage and religion], Alan MacHett, 02/06/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion,
Tanner Lovelace, 02/05/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion,
trekkie, 02/06/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion, childers . paula, 02/05/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion,
Alan MacHett, 02/05/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion, Sil Greene, 02/06/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion,
K. Jo Garner, 02/06/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion,
Jim Ray, 02/06/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion, Maria Winslow, 02/06/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] Marriage and religion,
Jim Ray, 02/06/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.