internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
RE: IRC (was RE: [internetworkers] New website ideas)
- From: "Michael D. Thomas" <mdthomas AT mindspring.com>
- To: "'Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/'" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: RE: IRC (was RE: [internetworkers] New website ideas)
- Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 13:53:29 -0500
> I have to wonder if having an INW IRC channel will reduce the traffic
> on the list? Can I just say that IRC is too much fun? I'm getting to
> have a conversation with multiple people in the brief quiet of
Caelan's
> nap. Aaaah.
Things might change around, but I think that it's really a different
kind of conversation. We have gatherings, we have email discussion, we
have IRC. For instance, after a morning of tossing around web site ideas
on IRC, I see that IRC is a lot looser and causal. But email discussions
can be more easily transformed into to documentation, design specs, etc.
We should put some kind of recorder on IRC so that we cure cancer over
there we can have it captured.
-
Re: IRC (was RE: [internetworkers] New website ideas)
, (continued)
- Re: IRC (was RE: [internetworkers] New website ideas), Tanner Lovelace, 10/28/2003
- Re: IRC (was RE: [internetworkers] New website ideas), Thomas Beckett, 10/28/2003
- Re: IRC (was RE: [internetworkers] New website ideas), David R . Matusiak, 10/28/2003
- RE: IRC (was RE: [internetworkers] New website ideas), Michael D. Thomas, 10/28/2003
- Re: IRC (was RE: [internetworkers] New website ideas), Jeremy Portzer, 10/28/2003
- Re: IRC (was RE: [internetworkers] New website ideas), Tanner Lovelace, 10/28/2003
- Re: IRC (was RE: [internetworkers] New website ideas), Sil Greene, 10/28/2003
- Re: IRC (was RE: [internetworkers] New website ideas), Tanner Lovelace, 10/28/2003
- Re: IRC (was RE: [internetworkers] New website ideas), Diana Duncan, 10/28/2003
- Re: IRC (was RE: [internetworkers] New website ideas), Sil Greene, 10/28/2003
- RE: IRC (was RE: [internetworkers] New website ideas), Michael D. Thomas, 10/28/2003
- Re: IRC (was RE: [internetworkers] New website ideas), Steven Champeon, 10/28/2003
- Re: IRC (was RE: [internetworkers] New website ideas), Thomas Beckett, 10/28/2003
- Re: IRC (was RE: [internetworkers] New website ideas), zman, 10/28/2003
- RE: IRC (was RE: [internetworkers] New website ideas), Michael D. Thomas, 10/28/2003
- RE: IRC (was RE: [internetworkers] New website ideas), Shea Tisdale, 10/28/2003
- Re: IRC (was RE: [internetworkers] New website ideas), Ian Meyer, 10/28/2003
- [internetworkers] Email scams, Shea Tisdale, 10/28/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Email scams, Steven Champeon, 10/28/2003
- RE: [internetworkers] Email scams, Shea Tisdale, 10/28/2003
- RE: [internetworkers] Email scams, Michael D. Thomas, 10/28/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.