internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

List archive

Re: [internetworkers] [kook]bikes vs. cars

From: Thomas Beckett <thomas AT tbeckett.com>
To: machett AT ibiblio.org, "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Cc:
Subject: Re: [internetworkers] [kook]bikes vs. cars
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 15:54:08 -0400

Alan MacHett wrote:

ignore this if (a)you're not a cyclist (motor- or bi-) or (b)don't want to
read me being kooky about it.

What if we're bi and/or just kooky but not a cyclist? I'm wondering if you're being inclusive enough here. Remember, just because you're straight, you don't have to be narrow.

TaB

[internetworkers] [kook]bikes vs. cars, Alan MacHett, 10/20/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] [kook]bikes vs. cars, zman, 10/20/2003
  - Re: [internetworkers] [kook]bikes vs. cars, Tanner Lovelace, 10/21/2003
    - RE: [internetworkers] [kook]bikes vs. cars, Scott Lundgren, 10/21/2003
      - Re: [internetworkers] [kook]bikes vs. cars, Z, 10/21/2003
      - RE: [internetworkers] [kook]bikes vs. cars, Alan MacHett, 10/21/2003
        
        RE: [internetworkers] [kook]bikes vs. cars, Sil Greene, 10/22/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] [kook]bikes vs. cars, David R . Matusiak, 10/21/2003
- RE: [internetworkers] [kook]bikes vs. cars, Michael Best, 10/21/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] [kook]bikes vs. cars, Thomas Beckett, 10/21/2003