internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: "Bill Geschwind" <geschwin AT email.unc.edu>
- To: "'InterNetWorkers'" <internetworkers AT franklin.metalab.unc.edu>
- Subject: RE: better dead than parasitic
- Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 15:48:51 -0500
> Actually, the misalignment between the Car and Light Truck
> categories is
> one of the ills that this new legislation is targeting.
This does bring up another point. Since all along a less restrictive set
of safety and environmental regulations has been in effect for light
trucks than cars, it has been in Detroit's best financial interest to
push trucks more than cars, since it costs them much less in engineering
expenses to comply with light truck regulations than with car
regulations (which means more profit for trucks). Bringing these two
sets of regulations closer together will become more important in the
near future when more of these so-called 'crossover' vehicles hit the
market, which are hybrids between cars and trucks. In fact, Detroit's
push for getting vehicles classified as trucks has even gone so far that
DaimlerChrysler has managed to get the PT Cruiser classified by some
government agencies as a car and by others as a truck!!
- Bill
-
RE: better dead than parasitic,
pawelka, 03/06/2002
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: better dead than parasitic, dan charlson, 03/06/2002
- RE: better dead than parasitic, Ron Thigpen, 03/06/2002
- RE: better dead than parasitic, sovenall, 03/06/2002
- RE: better dead than parasitic, Maria Winslow, 03/06/2002
- RE: better dead than parasitic, Bill Geschwind, 03/06/2002
- RE: better dead than parasitic, Mark Andrews, 03/06/2002
- RE: better dead than parasitic, Diana Duncan, 03/06/2002
- RE: better dead than parasitic, Rebecca Board, 03/06/2002
- RE: better dead than parasitic, Joe Reid, 03/07/2002
- RE: better dead than parasitic, Scott Russell, 03/07/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.