Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

["Austin, Roger" <rda AT rti.org>]

 I whined to their feedback location (once I finally found it on the new
site) and this was returned:

<message>
Thank you for visiting the new edition of WRAL.com, and thanks for your
feedback. 

We're sorry you are disappointed. It's always a risk to try and improve
something that so many people use and like. But we thought it was just
as risky not to try and make it better. Lots of our viewers seem to want
more information, and want quicker, more direct access to it. 

This is a work in progress. I hope you'll be willing to give WRAL.com
another try, and please keep telling us what you think. It's only
through feedback like yours that we can serve our visitors better. We
are working online and on-air to earn your loyalty. 

Michelle Singer
Senior Editor, WRAL.com
msi AT wral.com
</message>

 From what I gather, they have joined some national portal site which
runs a number of other sites to offer "better service and more ecommerce
revenue capabilities". It is time to move on to other sites IMHO. I
assume they dumped people so they could save money and become more
efficient. This is not a move in the right direction from my point of
view, but what the heck do I know?
 Roger (in RTP)

"Welna.Sarah" wrote:
> 
> What an absolute disaster!  I've been having nothing but problems ever
> since that dreadful morning they changed over to the "new" site.  It
> used to be the one place I could go to and get exactly what I
> wanted... now, I don't even know where to go for things, and when I do
> click on a link, I get errors 98% of the time.  Wonder if they (at
> WRAL) are even actively listening to the complaints about the new
> look/setup?  Anybody have any inside scoop?