homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Homestead mailing list
List archive
Re: [Homestead] Technology, was Tractors was: A homestead plan
- From: Clansgian AT wmconnect.com
- To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [Homestead] Technology, was Tractors was: A homestead plan
- Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:54:30 EDT
> >We all may be homesteaders, or wannabees, or used to bes, or just
> interested parties, but we all draw the line on technology and
> innovation somewhere. It may be based on health, the lay of the land,
> the job at hand, or finances.
>
All to the point as long as one has one's eyes open. The factor to which I
continaully allude is that people are brainwased into thinking that doing
something with a machine is easier, more economical, more efficacions than
doing the same task by hand or hand tools.
When we went to the movies last week, there was a new store in the strip
mall called "As Seen On TV". Being there half an hour early for the movie,
we
went in to look. It was very nearly as entertaining as the movie. It was
all the crap products you've ever seen on infomercials. Every ten feed
along the shelves was a flat screen monitor playing the infomercial and all
the
crap was on the shelves for you to buy. Most of it depends on the
"Alka-Seltzer" marketing approach ... you don't sell the cure rather you sell
the
disease making the buyer think he must then have the cure. So here is this
small portable on demand steamer and the infomercial shows someone crashing
into a wall trying to set up an ironing board then knocking over the iron and
burning their leg ..... "Has this ever happened to you!???"
So, says I, the first thing to do is to clear away the myths and biases
about hand work in order to make a rational decision.
We hear in all these discussions, as this time, about all the old timers
who curse horse drawn agriculture and were so glad to get hold of a tractor.
But what is omitted from that story is that at the time of hand tools and
horse tools, farms were quite small. It was when farms began to cosolidate
and take on debt, chemicals, and all other manner of ills I do not wish for
myself that tractors became easier than horses and hand tools. THAT's what
the old timers recall.
I am going to suggest three types of hand labor missteps:
First there is the case where it is just easier to do it by hand, but the
machine afficionado just can't help themselves, it has to be done with a
machine. Usually under the unfounded illusion that it saves time or labor.
Someone had given us a tree for firewood which they had bucked up into 1 1/2'
pieces. I parked the truck beside the wood and he said, "Wait, don't be
lifting all that wood, I'll get the tractor with the bucket." Go for the
tractor, start the tractor, scoot all the wood into a pile, lift it, and it
makes
a poor load since it is not stacked well." Took about twenty minutes all
together. Next load I didn't wait for him to show, I simply tossed the
pieces in the truck and it took about five minutes. As the last piece of
wood
was put in the truck, he came rumbling up on his beloved tractor ... "Ah,
man, I could have loaded that for you and saved you all that time!" Nothing
... nothing in heaven above or earth beneath would convince him that I'd
loaded the truck in a quarter of the time it took him. I don't even discuss
it
with people anymore. It's a MACHINE, we don't have to look at our watches or
any such ... by definition it takes less time with a machine, period, no
reason to think or investigate further.
The second case is where we are willing to substitute a machine for an
easily learned skill. A couple of years ago I attended a gathering where the
first night's supper is pot-luck chilli that everyone brings their own
version
and slaw and cornbread are supplied by the sponsor. I was cook and bottle
washer and came in with a score of cabbage heads and my own cutting board
and knife I'd brought from home. I hadn't seen some of the early arrivers
for
two or three years and as we caught up on news, I quarted, thin sliced, and
chopped the entire stack of cabbages. It is admittedly a practiced
regimen. But once the hands know it, it is deadly efficient. In a short
time I
was wiping up the board and knife and one of the people gabbing there
remarked, "I can't believe you made slaw out of all that cabbage with just a
knife
while we've been standing here!" Yet people are so convinced that the
Slice'em Dice'em Chop-o-matic just HAS to be so much faster than a knife,
there's
no reason to even consider the latter.
There's a NASCAR race here this weekend and although I try to avoid the
burgs altogether during race weekends, the seed'n'feed has a real deal on
filling propane tanks during the race. So I loaded up the tanks and headed
in.
There is a steep bank between the parking lot and parkway maybe 20' wide and
120' long and a fellow was there in the storm trooper suit with his gasoline
string trimmer mowing down the weeds. A scythe with a short blade is
faster, easier, less work, and does a better job on such jobs. I watched
him,
having mowed weeds in the pasture just that morning, and thought to myself,
"If I'd thrown the scythe in the back of the truck, I'd show him how I could
cover twice the ground in half the time he's taking." And yet I knew that
even if he saw it with his own eyes, he'd still be walking in a world where
the string trimmer was faster and less work.
Yet it is nothing more than the difference of a little easily learned skill.
The third case I am suggesting is when using a machine is indeed faster and
less work, but not all that much. The case in point is cutting firewood.
Everyone thinks that in a contest with a bowsaw and a chainsaw, the latter
would cut, what, fifteen to twenty times as much wood in a given time. In
reality it's more like a third more or less difference than that.
So yes we all choose how much technology, gagetry, and machinery we use.
But very few of us do it without a bias, and underlying and unsubstantiated
belief that the machine must per force be much much faster and easier.
----------------------------------
I found in looking back on my records that I tended to lose electronic
records. Computers crashed, disks became outdated, CD's aged and failed,
etc.
And yet the records I kept in journals and notebooks I still had all of them,
or nearly there abouts. So I've given up keeping any sort of computer
records. For day to day reminders to aid my rapidly failing short term
memory,
I beging the day with a blank sheet of copy paper folded in quarters which
gives me eight writing surfaces. That with a pencil keeps my shop notes,
kitchen notes, and garden notes so I don't keep showing up in a rush
somewhere
and ask myself, "What was it I came here for?" At the end of the day the
sheet is dated, unfolded and put in a notebook and constitutes a fairly
accurate daily record of what's going on around here.
James
-
Re: [Homestead] Technology, was Tractors was: A homestead plan,
Gil White, 08/20/2009
-
Re: [Homestead] Technology, was Tractors was: A homestead plan,
EarthNSky, 08/20/2009
-
Re: [Homestead] Technology, was Tractors was: A homestead plan,
Rob, 08/20/2009
- Re: [Homestead] Technology, was Tractors was: A homestead plan, Lynda, 08/20/2009
-
Re: [Homestead] Technology, was Tractors was: A homestead plan,
Rob, 08/20/2009
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [Homestead] Technology, was Tractors was: A homestead plan, Gil White, 08/20/2009
-
Re: [Homestead] Technology, was Tractors was: A homestead plan,
Clansgian, 08/20/2009
-
Re: [Homestead] Technology, was Tractors was: A homestead plan,
EarthNSky, 08/20/2009
- Re: [Homestead] Technology, was Tractors was: A homestead plan, Lynn Wigglesworth, 08/20/2009
- Re: [Homestead] Technology, was Tractors was: A homestead plan, Lynn Wigglesworth, 08/20/2009
-
Re: [Homestead] Technology, was Tractors was: A homestead plan,
EarthNSky, 08/20/2009
-
Re: [Homestead] Technology, was Tractors was: A homestead plan,
EarthNSky, 08/20/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.