Homestead mailing list

[Leslie <cayadopi AT yahoo.com>]

ROFLMAO !
 
Once upon a time, I was married to a former cop.  During a wire tap - they 
kept hearing references to all these different exotic animals,,,,, zebras, 
lions, etc.  The cops were convinced that it was code-speak for cocaine, 
marijuana, etc.  They made the raid - and guess what ---- it turned out that 
there were only zebras and lions etc on the property and no drugs or 
marijuana.
 
Over the years, I saw many such similar "misinterpretations" followed by 
prosecution by authorities.
 
It tough economic times,,,, I made the leap that any references to sell 
Zuchinis or Cukes could be really misinterpreted by the "Morals" 
police.......... LOL.  
 
 
Actually - its really not so funny .............. selling zucchinni black 
market could become just as illegal as what those people are going thru 
selling raw milk and coop beef........


--- On Sun, 1/11/09, Lynda <lurine AT com-pair.net> wrote:

From: Lynda <lurine AT com-pair.net>
Subject: Re: [Homestead] Fear & Loathing , new Peter Schiff interview, 
immeninent demis
To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Date: Sunday, January 11, 2009, 1:17 PM

Ah, geez, Leslie.  That's cucumbers, not zucchini <<eg>>

Lynda, who seems to be infected by Leslie's sense of humor.  It's all 
Leslie's fault!
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Leslie" <cayadopi AT yahoo.com>
To: <homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>


LOL - Psssst be careful that the morals police don't decide that your 
reference to a zuchinni refers to something else in code-speak....... LOL

(ya'll will just have to pardon my twisted sense of humor......)




>From bobford79 AT yahoo.com  Sun Jan 11 14:15:16 2009
Return-Path: <bobford79 AT yahoo.com>
X-Original-To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Delivered-To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix, from userid 3002)
        id 3EB394C014; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 14:15:16 -0500 (EST)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on malecky
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled
        version=3.2.3
Received: from web53909.mail.re2.yahoo.com (web53909.mail.re2.yahoo.com
        [206.190.36.219])
        by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C3AD24C00F
        for <homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 14:15:15 -0500 
(EST)
Received: (qmail 28805 invoked by uid 60001); 11 Jan 2009 19:15:15 -0000
X-YMail-OSG: 
HvyuH6MVM1mFFe47.gW9DVqlY6rjOYEE0YGgsdOlq4xu95JJurJpL29coTqgyURvW1mznuXHlR24LdcUl7uEoJ3OWCmL7_PmyEJMZ57E3y7PELngWCIYXXR_hciIiYixbOIPYF3AVvJkXGqzySdjb_vn6gcEvhPMT81DpThhxH3kfae7WJRGemxp0ZyqPYyWCOp7In1E4K.9uXdgm7A3eIuqQHVDfup5Q24-
Received: from [68.227.240.219] by web53909.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP;
        Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:15:15 PST
X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.260.1
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:15:15 -0800 (PST)
From: bobf <bobford79 AT yahoo.com>
To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
In-Reply-To: <496A424C.5070509 AT bellsouth.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Message-ID: <367410.28277.qm AT web53909.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Homestead] Chinampas
X-BeenThere: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: bobford79 AT yahoo.com, homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
List-Id: <homestead.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/homestead>,
        <mailto:homestead-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/homestead>
List-Post: <mailto:homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/homestead>,
        <mailto:homestead-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:15:16 -0000

Bev, as Leslie said before, you really do have a better understanding than 
you realize.  That is very obvious from what you wrote below.

 For those people whose happiness seems to depend on waiting for those in a 
different economic level to fail, they will one day realize that they have 
never experienced happiness.

 Sure, 'some' of the 'wealthy' will fall. But the percentages of those who 
work hard for what they have will be 'much' higher among those who fall. And, 
the hardest working will fall the hardest.

 There are books being written right now, I imagine, showing how to profit 
from the upcoming collapse.  It takes capital to do anything.  So the ones to 
profit, in large, will be the ones who already have capital.  It matters not 
if something is good or bad, right or wrong, when you are determining 
reality.  Reality just 'is'.................

---------------------------------------------------------------


--- On Sun, 1/11/09, EarthNSky <erthnsky AT bellsouth.net> wrote:

  I just don't see the wealthy starving anymore,  because they have the means 
to move and import.  They are resource  hogs...gleaners...never providing for 
themselves...  In the old days,  they died when the support was removed, but 
today, they would just move on to the next third world country to 
build/develop/exploit that....no collapse of the wealth, no cannibalism due 
to hunger...
>
> B