Homestead mailing list

[EarthNSky <erthnsky AT bellsouth.net>]

Jeanne Driese wrote:
> Bev wrote: It's a good, interesting, controversial book.
>
> But you don't believe that it would be worth trying some of the 
> things suggested to improve your health, because of lack of enough 
> evidence?

Well of course!  I did not mean it to sound like I was blowing the diet
part of it off.  You know I was interested in this because I was asking
about it a few months ago.  I have even said on the list that I know
that dairy and beef and such are bad for me and that I eat venison
almost exclusively for 'red' meat-I have been obsessed with getting a
deer..  So I am there with ya on this, okay?  ;)
For me, the controversy comes with the whole one blood type is more
evolved than another.... I look at blood types in humans more as strains
than as evolutionary changes, that's all.  And that's really not that
big of a deal, for me, but it is for some.



At the end of each chapter he has a long list of where he
> found his evidence, is that not so?

I gave the book back to my daughter, but yes, I recall he listed his
sources.


 I am very curious to know why
> you would not be willing to try out  the plan.

Again, we have a misunderstanding.  I am not against the plan-not at all.

Bev


--
The true significance of Sacajawea's involvement in the Lewis & Clark
expedition is that it was the first documented trip in history where men
asked a woman for directions and followed them, allowing them to arrive
at their destination.