Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

homestead - Re: [Homestead] "The Formerly Middle Class " - Commentary

homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Homestead mailing list

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: bob ford <bobford79 AT yahoo.com>
  • To: Lynda <lurine AT softcom.net>, homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [Homestead] "The Formerly Middle Class " - Commentary
  • Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 05:32:45 -0800 (PST)

I dis-agree with about half of what you just wrote; so , again maybe new
terminology ;or, old terminolgy with better definitions would be in order.
Regardless of whether you are better educated than me, we should know if we
are even talking about the same thing................


-------------------------------------------------------------------------


--- On Tue, 11/18/08, Lynda <lurine AT softcom.net> wrote:

> From: Lynda <lurine AT softcom.net>
> Subject: Re: [Homestead] "The Formerly Middle Class " - Commentary
> To: bobford79 AT yahoo.com, homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
> Date: Tuesday, November 18, 2008, 11:17 PM
> Use has changed because talking heads are dimwits. The
> definition remains the same. The problem is the average
> sheople hasn't a clue what the definition is and thus
> they go along with the overpaid idiots on television. We
> don't require any exhibition of intelligence in this
> country and therein lies the problem.
>
> A "comfortable living" is not a criteria of
> middle class. And "working class" can't be
> middle class. They are, by and large, by definition blue
> collar. Professionals and management are white collar.
>
> What we need is folks to stop being led around by their
> noses by people with less intelligence than some of my
> chickens! The whole "Big 3" thing is a prime
> example. They idiots on television, at least half of them,
> are running around like chicken little, screaming the sky is
> falling, the sky is falling because they don't know the
> difference between Ch. 11 and Ch. 7 bankruptsy. Because
> they don't know the difference between those two should
> we change their definitions also? We don't need to
> change anything, we need people to LEARN to speak English
> with a tiny bit of understanding of the definitions that
> already exist. Arg! Public school has been far to
> successful!
>
> Lynda








Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page