homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Homestead mailing list
List archive
- From: paxamicus AT earthlink.net
- To: bobford79 AT yahoo.com, homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [Homestead] Stealing an Election-Big Picture
- Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 22:36:34 -0400
Ok, now, define enemy combatants. They can be anyone. Yes, Joe the Plumber, if his neighbor who doesn't like him tells the cops he was doing something suspicious recently. There's actually an 800 Tip Line.
You and I...oh dear Bob, the greatest legal brains in the land are fighting over this, I don't we will be able to settle it to our satisfaction any time soon.
All I know is... I know I'm on SOME list, given the amount of protests I've been to. When I get stopped for some stupid traffic infraction I made by mistake, am I now an enemy combatant. Because the way the law reads, I could be.
On Oct 31, 2008, at 10:09 PM, bob ford wrote:
"[edit] Scope of the Act
Sec. 948b. Military commissions generally
(a) Purpose— This chapter establishes procedures governing the use of military commissions to try alien unlawful enemy combatants engaged in hostilities against the United States for violations of the law of war and other offenses triable by military commission. "
****Note "alien unlawful enemy combatants". 'not' "joe the citizen"
&
****SCOTUS has ruled that 'section 7 " of the Act is unconstitutional, though you wouldn't know it by going to the ACLU site. This is just fund-raising fodder for them - ignore their propaganda. By the way, I still don't know what section 7 is, but evidently that is what was found most objectional by the plaintaffs seeking habaeus corpus.
The Constitution does 'not' specifically give any rights to foreign combatants who are fighting against us on foreign soil. It just does not. This Act maight be good or bad depending on your view of "human" rights in war. But it does not conflict with the Constitution. .....bobford
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--- On Fri, 10/31/08, paxamicus AT earthlink.net <paxamicus AT earthlink.net> wrote:
From: paxamicus AT earthlink.net <paxamicus AT earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [Homestead] Stealing an Election-Big Picture
To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Date: Friday, October 31, 2008, 7:52 PM
As far as I know, Boumediene v. Bush was about military
detainees, it
did not impact the Military Commissions Act, which is what
constitutes
denial of habeus corpus to the average, begging your
pardon, Joe the
Plumber. And anyway, he issued some signing statement after
Boumediene
that negated what the SCOTUS said, anyway.
On Oct 31, 2008, at 5:26 PM, bob ford wrote:
The reach of habeas corpus is currently being testedin the United
States. Oral arguments on a consolidated GuantanamoBay detention
camp detainee habeas corpus petition,Court of the
Al Odah v. United States were heard by the Supreme
United States on December 5, 2007. US courts'jurisdiction was
altered by Congress in HR 1955, The ViolentRadicalization and
Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007.Boumediene v. Bush
On June 12, 2008, the Supreme Court ruling in
recognized habeas corpus rights for the Guantanamoprisoners. On
October 7, 2008, the first Guantanamo prisoners wereordered
released by a court considering a habeus corpuspetition.[3]
_______________________________________________
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habeas_corpus
Homestead list and subscription:
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/homestead
Change your homestead list member options:
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/homestead/bobford79%40yahoo.com
View the archives at:
https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/homestead
_______________________________________________
Homestead list and subscription:
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/homestead
Change your homestead list member options:
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/homestead/paxamicus%40earthlink.net
View the archives at:
https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/homestead
-
Re: [Homestead] Stealing an Election-Big Picture,
Lynn Wigglesworth, 10/31/2008
- Re: [Homestead] Stealing an Election-Big Picture, EarthNSky, 10/31/2008
- Re: [Homestead] Stealing an Election-Big Picture, bob ford, 10/31/2008
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [Homestead] Stealing an Election-Big Picture,
paxamicus, 10/31/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Stealing an Election-Big Picture,
bob ford, 10/31/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Stealing an Election-Big Picture,
paxamicus, 10/31/2008
- Re: [Homestead] Stealing an Election-Big Picture, bob ford, 10/31/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Stealing an Election-Big Picture,
paxamicus, 10/31/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Stealing an Election-Big Picture,
bob ford, 10/31/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.