homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Homestead mailing list
List archive
- From: "Lynda" <lurine AT softcom.net>
- To: <homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [Homestead] medical safety in this country
- Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 00:24:56 -0800
OBVIOUSLY you have an ax to grind. Yes, the patient care in the U.S. is dismal. HOWEVER, the majority of the responsibility lies with insurance companies and quite a bit lies at the feet of the patients.
And, NO, lab tests won't put the lie to most of the things patients do and don't report. Besides, if any doctor ran the number of tests necessary to rule out all the patient lies, the insurance companies would have fits AND the patients would have fits.
I've seen my share of dumbass doctors. I'm not deluded, but I'm not merrily making all the docs out to be the bad guys nor sending on the links that say "may have" "could be" etc. Either use facts or simply put in the subject line "personal rant."
Lynda
----- Original Message ----- From: "SJC" <indexer AT localnet.com>
To: <homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2008 11:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Homestead] medical safety in this country
Lynda wrote:
.........Both are the direct responsibility of the patient!I guess those are more than compensated by the 80-95% that don't get
reported as iatrogenic....
So, isatrogenic lists are worthless!Until your kid is on the butt end of it.......
BTW, ALL med errors are reported, period! Monthly, by all hospitals.Uhhh, that would be all med errors for which there is an incident
Doesn't matter whether or not they result in a death.
report, in a facility......which is not all med errors, by any means.
And the majority of med errors, by far, occur in walk-in and otherwise
non-hospitalized patients, where the 'official' record-keeping does not
often come into play. Furthermore, many go unrecognized by the patient
and are not reported as med errors to begin with. If you think all med
errors are reported you are either being deluded or deluding yourself.
Just as a little example of med errors that escape reporting, recently
my bloodthinner was changed to Coumadin and the dosage ordered seemed
high to me. Since I have had plenty of Coumadin in the past, I
questioned it but was assured that was the necessary dosage. Doctor was
new to me but had a full set of all my old and current records (enough
that copying the full set was over $20.00) so he could easily see what
levels of meds I've had in the past. I took half what was ordered for 4
days, then since even that seemed like such a high dosage and I had
numerous new bruises I couldn't account for, had a protime/inr done 3
days early (my dollar, of course). So high the lab had called me before
I got home, left message on machine, "See doctor immediately: your
protime/inr is dangerously high. Do not delay". Doctor furious I had
lowered dosage on my own and did his share of abusive yelling at my back
until lab report was faxed in as I was leaving. No apology. Reduced
dosage further, administered vitamin K (for which he tried to charge
me: I offered to report him to the state licensing bureau if I had to
pay for it) and sent me on my way. So another doctor bites the
dust...... Always keep your own records, folks.
You think he reported that? And the lab has no reason to report it.
If I had gone to the ER for the vitamin K it might have been reported,
or might not. It wasn't their med error. If they had seen a pattern
with a particular doctor it would be more likely to have been reported
but in my experience in ER the Good Ol' Boy system works for them:
'Hey, Bob, we got another one of your bleeders the other day, better
watch the Coumadin.'. No, all med errors are not reported, by a long
shot. I could cite hundreds of errors that went unreported over the
years I was working in the field (and since). There are plenty of ways
around reporting med errors.
Susan Jane, in Maine
_______________________________________________
Homestead list and subscription:
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/homestead
Change your homestead list member options:
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/homestead/lurine%40softcom.net
View the archives at:
https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/homestead
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.7.0/1683 - Release Date: 9/21/2008 10:10 AM
-
Re: [Homestead] Firewood
, (continued)
- Re: [Homestead] Firewood, Robert Walton, 09/12/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Firewood,
Bunjov, 09/12/2008
- Re: [Homestead] Firewood, Gene GeRue, 09/12/2008
- Re: [Homestead] Firewood, Bunjov, 09/12/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Firewood,
Robert Walton, 09/13/2008
- Re: [Homestead] Firewood, Gene GeRue, 09/13/2008
-
Message not available
-
Re: [Homestead] Firewood,
Robert Walton, 09/13/2008
- Re: [Homestead] Firewood to split or not, VAN DELL JORDAN, 09/13/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Firewood,
Robert Walton, 09/13/2008
-
[Homestead] Firewood,
Robert Walton, 09/22/2008
-
[Homestead] medical safety in this country,
SJC, 09/22/2008
-
Message not available
-
Message not available
-
Re: [Homestead] medical safety in this country,
Lynda, 09/22/2008
-
[Homestead] was medical safety in this country, now med errors,
SJC, 09/22/2008
- Re: [Homestead] was medical safety in this country, now med errors, Lynda, 09/22/2008
-
[Homestead] was medical safety in this country, now med errors,
SJC, 09/22/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] medical safety in this country,
Lynda, 09/22/2008
-
Message not available
-
Message not available
-
[Homestead] medical safety in this country,
SJC, 09/22/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Firewood,
SJC, 09/22/2008
- Re: [Homestead] Firewood, Robert Walton, 09/22/2008
-
[Homestead] Powder Post Beetles,
Roy Morgan, 09/22/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Powder Post Beetles,
SJC, 09/22/2008
- Re: [Homestead] Powder Post Beetles, Roy Morgan, 09/23/2008
- Re: [Homestead] Powder Post Beetles, eureka, 09/23/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Powder Post Beetles,
SJC, 09/22/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Firewood,
Akka Homestead, 09/22/2008
- Re: [Homestead] Firewood, Robert Walton, 09/22/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.